Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Jefferson Health Care

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Lees Summit
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    Constant staff changes. Some people are in wrong line of work. I do have several staff members I adore. Patients deserve better care from particular aides. Maybe it is a matter of more training...

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Was there for a graduation party. The grounds were well kept and nice

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I like to say a word of 2 Jefferson is wonderful well kept Care Facility...The Staff that i met are very kind and truly remarkable....I will recommend any family member to this facility'! Hollie B. Is One of Mostjt professional Staff I also met! I will be back

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    If want to put your loved ones in a nursing home with kind, caring and helpful people, this is the place. It isn't new and fancy, but it very well kept up and has one of the most professional staff I have ever encountered. My mother is extremely happy (even though she won't always admit it) but she always admits that she loves the staff. The director, Mr. Beck, is very kind and leads his staff with the same kindness he shows to all of the patients. The nurses are the absolute professional best and their assistants are so helpful. Even the maintenance men have helped my mother with great kindness and patience. I also think the food is quite good, although my very picky mother doesn't agree. However, the head of the cafeteria came to Mom's room and talked to her about what foods she likes to eat. Mom can order a grill cheese whenever the meal doesn't suit her. They also have a doctor on staff who is very competent and kind. I have only good things to say about this nursing home.

  • ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    My mom's medication somehow disappeared. So she got to sit in pain, while somebody was high on her percocets. I wouldn't trust them to watch my lawn. They would kill it. I saved my mom, she was there for a weekend.

About Jefferson Health Care

General Information

Legal Business NameJefferson Health Care Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 24, 1989 (29 years)
Capacity118
Residents64
Percent Occupied54%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Jefferson Health Care

Jefferson Health Care
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 8, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

November 25, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

August 7, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Jefferson Health Care require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
3hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.8%
96.8%
96.8%
96.8%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.0%
28.6%
27.3%
25.7%
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
27.7%
31.2%
29.2%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.9%
19.6%
17.8%
12.3%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
31.2%
25.0%
4.5%
4.5%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.4%
14.9%
14.6%
10.4%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.6%
10.2%
7.6%
3.4%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.0%
5.4%
12.1%
6.9%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3%
8.3%
7.7%
3.4%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
22.0%
11.8%
12.5%
5.3%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.9%
5.4%
3.4%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.8%
1.7%
1.7%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1%
5.1%
3.1%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.2%
96.7%
98.1%
98.0%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.7%
90.2%
90.2%
90.2%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
53.6%
66.3%
62.1%
-
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.0%
18.4%
16.7%
11.8%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
2.5%
2.9%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places