Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cedargate Healthcare

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Poplar Bluff Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Debra Zahmatkesh
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    This facility is terrible! When you call the facility and talk to nurses they have very little information about your family member. My Mother expressed that she just gets pushed out by the nurses station to just sit for the half the day. We stopped by for an unannounced visit and was able to see my Mother completely naked from the hallway. If moving her was in our capability we would but, unfortunately the facility does not abide by POA either so our hands are tied. Perfect strangers are able to call the facility and be given explicit information about any patient there all they need is the patient name and they will tell you anything in the chart. When I visited even though I am one of her POA's I was not allowed to see her record and had to argue to get specific information about my Mother's care with my Mother right with me telling them to show me.

  • Debra Pruitt
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    There is a resident phone but. Good luck talking to your resident. We have waiting on hold numerous times for 30 to 40 minutes at a time. When we asked the nursing staff about it the response was "not surprising" The staff can be well aware if a family member acting inappropriately where care is concerned but, won't deal with it. They just pass off a member of residents families behavior as "nothing they can do anything about" My Mother has gotten much sicker since being in their care at a rapid pace and let a family member pursue getting her falsely diagnosed so they can have control of her assets. The social service lady is EXTREMELY rude and non caring. She has residents sign paperwork they do not understand. Ridiculous lack luster care!

  • Angie Bolin
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Cedargate Healthcare has some of the most wonderful people you will ever meet. Stop by and have a look around for yourself!!!

  • Regina Dorris
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Highly recommend .

  • Taylor Reagan
    ★★★★★ a year ago

About Cedargate Healthcare

General Information

Legal Business NameCedargate Healthcare Group LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 25, 1983 (36 years)
Capacity108
Residents56
Percent Occupied52%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cedargate Healthcare

Cedargate Healthcare was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 27, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionOperate and provide services according to Federal, State, and local laws and professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHire sufficient dietary support personnel.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide proper discharge planning and communication, of the resident's health status and summary of the resident's nursing home stay.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cedargate Healthcare require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.2%
74.2%
74.2%
74.2%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
51.8%
47.2%
48.9%
37.5%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
25.0%
18.2%
-
-
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.5%
30.2%
34.1%
38.6%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.7%
48.4%
24.4%
31.7%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.5%
15.4%
13.0%
13.0%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.7%
29.2%
32.5%
10.0%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.4%
0.0%
10.9%
10.4%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.2%
24.1%
10.0%
5.0%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.9%
3.2%
9.1%
9.7%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.2%
6.2%
8.5%
2.2%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4%
1.9%
0.0%
2.1%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.7%
9.4%
8.5%
8.3%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

29.0%
57.1%
53.1%
36.0%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.7%
60.0%
60.0%
60.0%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.9%
3.0%
2.7%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places