Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rehabilitation Center Of Raymore, The

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Raymore
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I have had both shoulders replaced, three knees and been in four different homes for rehab and this one so far Is the best in my opinion. Have another two weeks to go.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mom is at Rehab of Raymore and I couldn't be happier! What was supposed to be a short-term respite visit turned into a great place for Mom to stay. The staff is very caring and kind. They are able to help her with showers and her medications. She really enjoys the activities and has made new friends.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    This place is a deplorable dump. The staff completely lacks professionalism, compassion, & empathy for the residents. No one greets you when you walk in, and when you do finally get someone to make eye contact with you, they make you feel like you're bothering them. The quality of care is poor. Medications are not administered within the prescribed time period. My loved one, who is continent, was forced to wait hours to go to the restroom because no one would answer the call light. We are so glad to be done with RCR. They don't even deserve the one star required to write this review.

  • ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Worst nursing home ever! My mother in law had many unexplained falls and horrible bruising. Soiled residents every time I walked in the place. Lazy staff. This place should be shut down. One resident was walking around no shoes no socks. Toe nails 2 inches long. Sad!!!!!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    It pained me to even give it the one star that I have to give it in order to write this review. Poor quality from the bottom all the way to the top. The folks at the top talk a good talk. I was very hesitant prior to placing my family member there, but I was told how much better they had become. Smooth talking is all it was. Low class people work there. They really do act like they hate the patients. Makes you wonder why they come to work every day. Go get a job at McDonalds! They yell at them and show no compassion. Everything is done at the bare minimum, if done at all. I caught staff who made false records, and the directors just try to again talk their way out of it. There is a LOT of neglect happening there also, and infections happen as a result. If you are not involved with your loved one and not there and knowing what is going on, it is really unfortunate because they will take advantage of that and that person does NOT receive quality care. Call lights ring all the time and there is no urgency at all to answer them. There are much better centers than this one, so please do some research and find a better location. This place poses a health risk and is not a safe environment, in my opinion.

About Rehabilitation Center Of Raymore, The

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Rehabilitation Center Of Raymore, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 20, 1991 (26 years)
Capacity142
Residents118
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rehabilitation Center Of Raymore, The

Rehabilitation Center Of Raymore, The
was reviewed by to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 29, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a detailed, written plan for disasters and emergencies, such as fire, severe weather, and missing residents.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHire sufficient dietary support personnel.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionOffer other nutritional food to each resident who will not eat the food served.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

November 12, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

July 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

May 11, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionEncode each residents assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rehabilitation Center Of Raymore, The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 40min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 45min
3hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

71.7%
89.9%
89.9%
89.9%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.1%
85.8%
80.4%
92.6%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
25.0%
22.0%
23.1%
10.7%
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.4%
39.5%
28.4%
28.4%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
31.9%
15.9%
38.3%
18.9%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.2%
31.4%
33.0%
34.1%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.3%
17.4%
50.0%
17.8%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3%
0.0%
7.6%
4.8%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.0%
17.1%
7.4%
8.7%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3%
7.0%
5.8%
7.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.4%
5.8%
7.0%
2.4%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.0%
0.0%
5.3%
2.2%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.0%
4.7%
4.1%
3.2%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
10.3%
5.7%
4.9%
5.2%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

62.3%
57.0%
49.3%
41.2%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.2%
58.5%
58.5%
58.5%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.7%
50.1%
48.0%
58.7%
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.5%
28.9%
26.4%
16.0%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.5%
1.4%
4.1%
4.8%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
2.1%
2.0%
0.9%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places