Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Aperion Care Hidden Lake

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Saint Louis
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Yoland Hh
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Very very poor hospitality. They aren't mindful to elders. Distasteful reputation of lies. 24/7 nursing staff was a lie, choice of showers days, meals to eat, and many more fake fraudulent tells, just to get my mothers 15,600.$ mthly. The activity conductor should be the administrator, she alone is a positive pioneer. The staff (CNAs) fight among each other while in the presence of your love one... it's like high school and a day care combined. I also was offended by their ill humor. Calling my mom and her friends the old lady gang. Apparently it's all about the money. They beg my mom to stay until the 1st and accept a reimbursement of her pay later in the month, we are victims.

  • Rev. Rita-Renee Hollinshed
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    We are amazed by the service of the staff! They have embraced our father as though he belonged to their family and this exudes a confidence that he is well taken care of beyond our visits. The staff is also instrumental in receiving family and servicing our needs during our visits, seeking to comfort us as well. Andrew is amazing in not only marketing this venue, but his follow through has been thorough and compassionate! The 2nd floor AM & PM staff are top notch, esp. 'Shaina' (sp?) ~ she is caring and very passionate about her patients and makes us all feel "at home!" Thank you, Aperion, for providing a place for our father to be restored and nurtured in your facility. Your staff and the accommodations are nothing short of amazing and we are grateful!

  • TheSte314
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The worst place to work they have bottom of the line food they put on a big front like there five star really the one star they say the resedents is number one really they last how I seen them been taking care of

  • Stephanie Meyer
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    The staff at Hidden Lake are exceptionally committed to providing the very best service and care to the residents at Hidden Lake. Many of the staff consider the residents part of their extended family. I would highly recommend this community to anyone who is looking for personalized, resident-centered care for themselves or a loved one.

  • Teresa Ritz
    ★★★★★ a month ago

About Aperion Care Hidden Lake

General Information

Legal Business NameAperion Care Hidden Lake LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 26, 2002 (16 years)
Capacity67
Residents56
Percent Occupied84%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Aperion Care Hidden Lake

Aperion Care Hidden Lake
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 12, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain 15 months of resident assessments in the resident's active clinical record.

February 27, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Aperion Care Hidden Lake require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 20min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
79.2%
79.2%
79.2%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.2%
93.5%
94.6%
91.9%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
70.0%
60.0%
-
-
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.3%
17.8%
18.8%
25.0%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.6%
23.1%
25.4%
24.5%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.1%
13.0%
10.8%
18.9%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.0%
16.7%
17.2%
22.9%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.9%
5.8%
3.0%
3.2%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1%
15.2%
10.8%
2.7%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
6.1%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.5%
7.5%
8.6%
2.9%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.2%
2.3%
2.8%
2.2%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.8%
90.4%
86.7%
61.3%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
82.7%
82.7%
82.7%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
48.1%
-
78.9%
73.7%
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
26.7%
5.4%
15.9%
17.9%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places