Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

James River Nursing And Rehabilitation

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Springfield Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Pine Bay
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My grandmother was a patient at the James River Care for the last six months of her life. I chose this facility because it is very close to my house and work. Deaf, unable to ambulate, and mentally impaired, my grandmother required a lot of supervision and care. Her care was exceptional. I purposely withheld information from the staff, that I, her grandson and only relative, was a healthcare professional. Each time that I visited with my grandmother, I was keenly aware that she was receiving the best care possible. I was with her on the Wednesday evening that she took her last breath and embraced her Savior and entered Heaven's Gate. What a joy it is for me to know that grandmother was treated with such professionalism and dignity while she was a patient at James River. May God richly bless the many wonderful staff members who cared for my grandmother. Thank you so much! Dylan S. Clifton, Professional Educator Emeritus

  • Jerry Chin
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Mary and I have had a good experience here. If we ever have to choose a rehab facility again, I have no problem with coming back. Good care, friendly staff, and the food is nutritious and tastes good. If you need something, ask. Thanks to all for a great experience.

  • Leon Bryant
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I don't understand why Maggie offers a job to a 28 year old a supervisor job when she tells lies about co workers.this is why James River is loosing there good workers is because it's a joke.and also this person won't help the houskeepers make beds or even clean rooms.but the other thing is that I think they need to take a great big broom and sweep the ones that don't work out and start over with a new boss.but they won't because some people live drama so that they have something to complain about because they don't have a life them selves.the first thing that I would do is not hire young kids and not hire husband and wife.but if James River keeps this up letting someone try to be a supervisor and not help the house keepers they won't be in buissness very long.

  • Steve Cook
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    James River was a horrible experience. My father went there straight from Mercy hospital. We were taken to a marginally furnished room and waited 5 hours for staff to say anything to us. give This was during the dinner hour. No one even peeked in the door to welcome my father or check on his condition after 5 hours of absolutely NO ATTENTION whatsoever. I escorted my father out and took him home. Total BS and unbelievable. We ended up taking dad to The Maples where he had a wonderful experience. Can't believe James River got the rating they did. Couldn't have been any worse.

  • Evie Duffey
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    The staff are wonderful! You are their priority! Would recommend this facility to anyone!

About James River Nursing And Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameJrnrc Ops Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 17, 1997 (23 years)
Capacity120
Residents107
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for James River Nursing And Rehabilitation

James River Nursing And Rehabilitation was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
James River Nursing And Rehabilitation has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of James River Nursing And Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 35min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 60min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
100.0%
97.7%
98.9%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
45.7%
46.7%
46.2%
35.8%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.3%
31.5%
30.0%
32.9%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
41.8%
36.3%
14.7%
28.8%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.2%
17.6%
16.5%
10.2%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.8%
30.1%
25.7%
23.6%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.4%
6.5%
7.1%
7.8%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
5.0%
4.8%
6.1%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.0%
3.9%
1.0%
8.7%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5%
1.1%
1.2%
1.1%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
4.3%
4.6%
4.4%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
0.9%
3.9%
3.8%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.8%
3.2%
1.1%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.8%
95.3%
91.7%
80.3%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.5%
86.5%
86.5%
86.5%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.9%
78.6%
73.6%
72.5%
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.9%
7.5%
7.1%
10.7%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
1.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
1.5%
1.2%
0.5%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places