Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Jordan Creek Nursing & Rehab

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Springfield Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Ci Grif
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    They have great aides. One recognized that there was something wrong with my mother. She went to the nurse and did not stop advocating for my mothers change in condition until the nurse was done with her task and came and check my mother out. The nurse reacted promptly and sent my mother out to the ER. She was in A-Fib and blood pressure became critical. She was in the hospital for several days and was able to return back to the facility. I know that the staff, especially this aide actually care about the residents and works very hard

  • B G
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I came here for strengthening and rehab. I had a good stay and was able to return back to my assisted living. The staff there were great.

  • Jessie McDonald
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I have worked for Jordan Creek for over 16 years now. Over the years we have gone through many changes. However, there are a large group of people that have been here a long time. They stay for two reasons love for the residents and love for the building. While some residents and family may not be happy with our care. A lot of the residents are. You can see this when you walk through the doors and see their smiles. So, before you make your judgment that was just another nursing home. Please come see what Jordan Creek is all about.

  • Chad Ernist
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I came here for rehabilitation and had a great experience. The staff there was excellent and very friendly. I would recommend them to anyone.

  • Laura Phillips
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I love this facility and I've worked at plenty. No one is paying anyone for reviews here. Pictured is my administrator, Shanda, helping out on floors, (forgive me...) and myself, Felix. CMT/RNA. Please come find me at the facility if you doubt my review. I'll be glad to tour the building with you. ??This is an incredible place to work.?? I have repeatedly been offered opportunity and have been treated very well here by the staff. Our residents are A-MAZING. And they are very loved and cared for by our staff. If in doubt, come ask the residents themselves! I understand not everyone will have the same opinion as I do. All facilities have ups and downs and over come things together. I have found, that Jordan Creek does the very best it can to work together through what ever comes. And that counts for a lot to me!

About Jordan Creek Nursing & Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameN & R Of Greene Haven LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 21, 1989 (30 years)
Capacity120
Residents104
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Jordan Creek Nursing & Rehab

Jordan Creek Nursing & Rehab was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 9, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Jordan Creek Nursing & Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 5min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
3hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

79.4%
97.3%
97.3%
97.3%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.3%
99.0%
97.0%
96.0%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
7.1%
16.0%
18.8%
19.1%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
30.1%
21.6%
27.1%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.3%
23.9%
24.7%
26.3%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.7%
14.4%
12.4%
12.5%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.0%
15.2%
29.9%
27.1%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.9%
9.0%
6.0%
4.0%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.7%
6.0%
5.8%
0.0%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
22.8%
12.7%
10.7%
9.9%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
1.1%
1.1%
2.2%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
5.0%
6.0%
6.0%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
1.5%
3.0%
2.7%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

40.3%
60.6%
71.6%
67.6%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.1%
63.4%
63.4%
63.4%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
47.0%
55.8%
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.2%
25.0%
29.4%
31.6%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.3%
3.4%
0.0%
2.7%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.9%
4.0%
1.8%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places