Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Golden Age Living Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Stover
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

About Golden Age Living Center

General Information

Legal Business NameGolden Age Nursing Home District
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 1996 (21 years)
Capacity61
Residents52
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Golden Age Living Center

Golden Age Living Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 5, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

June 5, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Golden Age Living Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 5min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
95.7%
95.7%
95.7%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.8%
95.2%
95.6%
92.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
33.3%
34.5%
38.7%
35.5%
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.3%
23.3%
28.9%
26.5%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.0%
20.0%
16.1%
13.1%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.0%
21.4%
22.2%
24.0%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.2%
11.9%
13.3%
14.3%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
19.7%
11.7%
4.9%
4.2%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.8%
14.3%
8.9%
10.0%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2%
7.7%
7.1%
6.7%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.9%
2.5%
4.5%
8.5%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.1%
4.8%
4.4%
8.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
2.4%
4.4%
6.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
4.4%
1.9%
1.6%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

74.4%
93.5%
92.3%
100.0%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.1%
93.3%
93.3%
93.3%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.7%
-
-
-
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
45.7%
23.1%
7.4%
3.3%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7%
7.4%
4.2%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.0%
5.2%
0.0%
2.4%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened