Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Country Club Care Center Of Warrensburg

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Warrensburg
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Vicky Gibson
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I hated working there. Loved my job and hours. But within my first month or so, had an almost physical confrontation with an LPN, who decided slamming the door on me, while trying to leave an argument consisting of 2 nurses telling me what I would do and how much time they would give me to do it, was productive and professional . Upper management is on Power trips, very disrespectful. Everything is about them. A lot of too young and no experience going on. I witnessed an Aid get bullied almost daily. D.O.N. was told of situation multiple times. The guilty nurse still works there spreading the hate. Very little team work. I would NOT recommend this facility for employment with the current Management.

  • Vannessa Brown
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I hate working there. No team work at all. I did my best. When i reported something they didn't believe. Never put your love one there.

  • Mehgan Simpson
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My grandmother was treated so poorly, and lost 40 pounds in 2 months. They would not help her to the bathroom. They would say she didnt really have to go, and then she would soil herself. She was admitted into the E.R. after 2 months staying there. She was so dehydrated that her liver was failing. She had bed sores thay had not been treated in over 24 hours because "they didn't have time". They placed my grandmother in assisted feeding, but when I snuck behind the wall and watched, the nurses were gossiping, while my grandmother struggled to try and pick up a fork. A review was posted on a Facebook page called "Review the Burg". Laura, the director mad a comment calling everyone who gave a bad review uneducated and liars. She also claimed they are top rated. I did my research and they are the lowest rated in Warrensburg.

  • laura hand
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    my mother was there resently. and she was treated with no respect. they didn't give her the meals she made a menu for and they where very slow to give pain meds and also they sat her in a wheel chair and sprayed hot water on her for a shower and she had told them she had dirreaha. I feel really sorry for the people that are there with out family who cares. I will never let them send her there again. nurses where mad because they had to work doubles. my sister even tried to get a nurses attention one day and was ignored till she raised her voice. some one needs to look into this.

  • Ashley Wyatt
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Lovely

About Country Club Care Center Of Warrensburg

General Information

Legal Business NameCountry Club Care Center Of Warrensburg L C
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 9, 1996 (22 years)
Capacity73
Residents54
Percent Occupied74%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Country Club Care Center Of Warrensburg

Country Club Care Center Of Warrensburg
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 15, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Country Club Care Center Of Warrensburg require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
10min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 45min
3hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.1%
98.1%
98.1%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
19.2%
28.0%
19.0%
25.0%
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.9%
15.4%
15.8%
14.3%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.5%
13.4%
5.9%
5.5%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.4%
21.3%
20.0%
15.7%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.9%
18.9%
13.5%
29.3%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.1%
7.6%
3.1%
8.9%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.2%
2.1%
2.3%
2.1%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.6%
21.7%
-
10.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
15.2%
13.0%
7.0%
6.2%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1%
6.4%
9.1%
4.2%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1%
8.5%
4.4%
9.8%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
3.0%
3.3%
4.6%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.1%
98.2%
100.0%
100.0%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.6%
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5%
89.2%
85.1%
83.8%
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.1%
16.3%
15.6%
9.3%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.6%
7.1%
6.6%
7.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places