Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cedarcrest Manor

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Washington Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Anna Winger
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    If I could give 0 stars I would. This place is utterly disgusting and treats it's patients with pure disrespect and a filthy living environment.

  • Paula Hanson
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    There is no nursing home on earth giving perfect care; however Cedarcrest is striving to give individualized care in a warm, family-like environment! You will feel loved and cared about! You will eat wonderful meals, have good nursing care, have top notch therapy and make new friends!

  • hadley Hanson
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I appreciate the recognition given to military veterans. They are truly honored through presentation of plagues and the honor flight program.

  • Jessica Graves
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Cedarcrest has a very caring staff that goes above and beyond for their residents! They have an excellent therapy department for the residents if needed as well as rehab to home.

  • Nenuphar Mitsune
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I work here and I enjoy it.

About Cedarcrest Manor

General Information

Legal Business NameWashington N & R, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 10, 1983 (36 years)
Capacity177
Residents104
Percent Occupied59%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cedarcrest Manor

Cedarcrest Manor was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Cedarcrest Manor has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cedarcrest Manor require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 55min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
3hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.4%
98.1%
98.1%
98.1%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.2%
66.7%
68.9%
70.5%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
24.1%
25.5%
27.5%
27.1%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.6%
28.8%
29.1%
24.7%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
3.9%
7.7%
11.8%
8.4%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.6%
14.5%
10.5%
9.6%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
11.4%
12.0%
1.3%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1%
2.2%
1.9%
0.0%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
7.1%
6.5%
6.6%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.1%
3.0%
0.7%
2.8%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1%
7.5%
4.9%
8.6%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
3.2%
2.8%
4.8%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
2.3%
0.9%
1.8%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

74.2%
82.7%
81.0%
57.1%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.8%
77.8%
77.8%
77.8%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.3%
77.9%
72.1%
85.4%
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.0%
5.8%
3.4%
0.0%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7%
2.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places