Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Brandon Court

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Mississippi (MS)
  4. Brandon
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • sharon wood
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Compassionate and caring staff. Wonderful facility!

  • Linda Harper
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My father was at Brandon Court rehab for approximately one week. If I had not been there to help, I feel they would have killed him. His bathroom smelled so bad that I would have to close the door to it when I visited. In the common area (dining hall) other residents were yelling for help or trying to get out of their chairs while those who were supposed to be assisting them were out of the room or chatting with each other. It was a real nightmare! If I could give zero stars, I would.

  • Monica-Christine Kruger
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    It's the courthouse. Not much else to say about that.

About Brandon Court

General Information

Legal Business NameRankin Community Care Center, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 1, 2000 (17 years)
Capacity100
Residents94
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Brandon Court

Brandon Court
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Mississippi Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 11, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

June 11, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

May 22, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Brandon Court require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 35min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 4hr 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

88.5%
98.8%
98.8%
98.8%
96.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.0%
76.7%
85.2%
63.9%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.3%
33.3%
36.1%
31.4%
26.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.8%
21.9%
19.1%
4.5%
18.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.0%
23.7%
25.7%
22.7%
20.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.1%
29.6%
36.6%
11.4%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.9%
5.2%
2.8%
4.9%
9.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.5%
9.2%
6.8%
13.3%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.2%
1.8%
1.7%
5.3%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.9%
0.0%
5.8%
1.4%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.5%
3.9%
4.1%
6.7%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
5.1%
5.3%
5.3%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
3.2%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4%
1.3%
3.9%
1.3%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.5%
94.7%
89.8%
93.9%
86.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
56.2%
87.4%
87.4%
87.4%
84.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
51.4%
58.5%
65.0%
64.7%
60.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.5%
14.3%
8.1%
7.3%
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.5%
2.4%
2.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places