Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Ms Care Center Of Greenville

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Mississippi (MS)
  4. Greenville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    My family member has been a patient here and we have experienced nothing but superb care and warm friendly people, from the nursing staff to the assistance with administrative services. We appreciate the attentive care given to our family and the therapy services exceed any we have experienced in the past.

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

About Ms Care Center Of Greenville

General Information

Legal Business NameWashington County Ltc, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 1, 1997 (20 years)
Capacity116
Residents101
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Ms Care Center Of Greenville

Ms Care Center Of Greenville
was reviewed by to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Mississippi Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 2, 2016 - 18 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

May 21, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Ms Care Center Of Greenville require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
99.0%
99.0%
99.0%
96.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.7%
65.7%
60.0%
61.8%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.0%
43.2%
37.4%
38.0%
26.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
39.9%
25.2%
24.9%
30.3%
18.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.5%
28.6%
29.4%
30.2%
20.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.3%
15.0%
12.8%
17.5%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.1%
2.6%
2.2%
4.4%
9.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.1%
8.3%
5.6%
7.8%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7%
8.6%
7.9%
7.4%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7%
4.2%
2.2%
2.2%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
2.1%
2.2%
3.3%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
3.1%
1.6%
1.5%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
15.6%
11.3%
12.1%
14.1%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

84.3%
92.0%
96.1%
100.0%
86.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
83.7%
83.7%
83.7%
84.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
60.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
18.5%
8.3%
10.3%
16.7%
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1%
3.6%
7.4%
3.2%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
0.0%
3.5%
4.4%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places