Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Lakeland Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLC

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Mississippi
  3. Jackson Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Gabe Reeves
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My grandmother and my grandfather were both residents at Lakeland. They both received excellent care and were able to get the therapy they needed to return home to live independently!! I am so grateful to all the staff at Lakeland for everything they have done to help care for my family!!!!

  • Jennifer Hart
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Wouldn't recommend this place to anyone. The only good part about my father's stay was the rehab. Too many problems to name.

  • Melinda Hinton
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I have been in the medical profession for over 25 years and have been in many of the nursing homes throughout the State of Mississippi. When I was faced with having to have my mother placed in a nursing home, I knew that Lakeland Nursing and Rehab would be my 1st choice. Her care there was exceptional. Sometimes late at night, the nurses couldn't get my mom to settle down and they would call me so I could talk to her and calm her down. The nursing staff and physical therapists were always so patient with her when she was having a bad day. Keanna, LPN, was my mom's night Nurse and treated her like she was her own grandmother. Often when I would go to visit, she would be sitting in the day room with her bags packed and Abby, the Administrator, Nikki and Mary from Admissions, or Audrey from Social Services would be consoling her. Thanks to all the staff at Lakeland Nursing and Rehab, my mom got to come home. If we ever have to go this route again, you will still be my 1st choice!

  • Syb Jon
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    It had been my intent to post comments concerning this facility the 2nd day my father entered their doors for rehab purposes, but I realized what I had to say would be too emotionally-charged. I want to pass along information to anyone that reads reviews& is considering this facility as a potential choice for any reason that is as clear-cut as I possibly can. So, WARNING: THIS WILL NOT BE SHORT. The admissions director, Nikki& admissions coordinator, Mary gave a "good script" on the efforts that are put forward by the personnel to ensure quality care of the residents at the facility. Anyone who didn't know any better(like myself& my family who were new to the area) would've been impressed by what they had to say. Based on that& an initial visit we scheduled to the facility, my mother, myself& my siblings believed this would be a good place for my father's rehabilitation to take place. There were some problems from the door; the bed he was assigned didn't go up or down as it should& didn't have all the coverings as usually supplied by the facility, but a physical therapist who came in to introduce herself a couple of hours after his arrival took time to figure out getting the bed to operate properly& we were willing to take care of issue of the coverings for it. The methods of the physical therapy staff, though not the best, I believe can be considered acceptable. However, all goes downhill from there. The nursing staff has the poorest professional manner--especially 2 named Amy& Lisa! Even some showed abusive mistreatment toward some residents; I witnessed this myself! There was 2 nursing assistants I wish I could remember by name that were completely out of place there because they had a better knowledge of treatment& polite bedside manner than any of the nurses did. To this day, I thank them for their kindness. Worst of all was the mannerism the facility's director, Abby. This woman has the most "I CAN CARE LESS" attitude I've ever had the displeasure to encounter! I don't know what methods were used in which she obtained the position she holds, but they couldn't have had anything to do with her character as a person let alone a person with authority! Ultimately but thankfully, we removed my father from this place. I'm happy to say with GOD'S BLESSINGS, he's doing so much better. Those who have to remain there are in my prayers.

  • MoWet Entertainment
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    The facility is horrible the people are completely unprofessional I wouldn't recommend this place to everyone

About Lakeland Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLC

General Information

Legal Business NameLakeland Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 1, 1989 (31 years)
Capacity105
Residents95
Percent Occupied90%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Lakeland Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLC

Lakeland Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLC was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Mississippi Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 23, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

August 4, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$5,500 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Lakeland Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLC require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.4%
90.5%
90.5%
90.5%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.1%
92.3%
100.0%
100.0%
97.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
52.6%
52.8%
50.0%
60.6%
49.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.0%
21.7%
20.4%
22.6%
26.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.0%
18.4%
17.1%
30.1%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.4%
18.8%
12.1%
18.2%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.7%
21.7%
13.0%
30.6%
16.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.5%
8.3%
1.8%
7.9%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1%
7.1%
14.6%
3.4%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.3%
7.0%
18.8%
7.6%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.1%
0.0%
3.4%
4.5%
4.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
3.1%
3.4%
4.4%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.2%
2.2%
0.9%
0.8%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9%
4.6%
3.4%
2.9%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.3%
97.0%
97.4%
97.9%
87.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.6%
88.8%
88.8%
88.8%
84.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.1%
62.2%
58.1%
47.0%
63.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.0%
20.2%
27.7%
28.1%
15.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.8%
1.5%
2.1%
1.4%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.4%
0.6%
0.3%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MS
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places