Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St John's Lutheran Home

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Montana (MT)
  4. Billings
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Up until today I loved my job, my job was threatened today and I have to tell you I'm beyond humiliated!! I called into the office only to be informed I don't know my job by my team who by the way are doing things state would frown on like taking a BG at the dinner table while other residents were trying to eat? I got 2 weeks training on med pass only because NOBODY showed up to sign me off, claiming now I don't even know how to do that, I decided St Johns is going to lose when excellent employee I REFUSE to be treated this way!!!???

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I have loved my time at St. John's. Employees truly care for the elders who live at St. John's, which is why we are all there. We work in an atmosphere that promotes growth and learning opportunities for employees if desired.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    St. John's is incredibly accomodating for those vulnerable populations they serve and I believe as a community they strive to care and provide for all residents despite financial and social status. I have had excellent experiences with this ministry in private and professional dealings and would highly recommend for care of a loved one as well as for employment.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My Mom is a resident and the staff have been wonderful and caring. It is difficult to see her slip further into dementia, but the staff remains care, even when she can be a bit difficult.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I thought staff was very rude. I went to talk to someone about my dad comeing to live at St John's. Staff was rude. Refused to show me areas of the facility. Told me some of my questions were out of line. I was looking for the best facility for my fathers care. I obviously didn't choose St Johns. When a business refuses to show you where the their patients eat or answer questions regarding their facilities there is something wrong.

About St John's Lutheran Home

General Information

Legal Business NameSt Johns Lutheran Ministries
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity186
Residents172
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St John's Lutheran Home

St John's Lutheran Home
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Montana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 1, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

October 22, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St John's Lutheran Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 35min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 15min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.3%
99.3%
99.3%
99.3%
95.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.6%
99.3%
100.0%
91.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
54.1%
58.1%
57.1%
56.7%
43.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.9%
12.8%
13.8%
10.6%
19.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.4%
12.6%
10.4%
13.8%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.7%
13.1%
14.5%
16.3%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.8%
4.5%
4.7%
13.1%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.6%
3.2%
2.9%
10.7%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
3.6%
5.0%
4.4%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7%
3.1%
4.1%
3.3%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.3%
3.0%
2.9%
5.2%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.5%
0.0%
0.7%
2.2%
4.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.5%
5.1%
2.2%
2.2%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3%
2.9%
2.4%
0.7%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

84.6%
84.2%
81.1%
80.5%
77.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.6%
85.0%
85.0%
85.0%
76.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.3%
59.5%
65.2%
71.1%
68.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
19.0%
13.2%
17.1%
19.7%
21.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.5%
1.1%
0.5%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.8%
0.4%
0.4%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places