Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Valley Health & Rehabilitation

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Montana
  3. Billings Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Tawny Worm
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    The food was real good, nursing was very good, housekeeping was very good and they were always in there cleaning and they made sure to do it when I was away from my room so they weren't in the way. Therapy is fun, they work you good and they make it fun and I loved every minute of it. They helped me get better and I would recommend this place. If something happens again, I'm coming back here. And you can't forget the good help from the CNA's, they are very very caring.

  • B Owens
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    I'm very very pleased at the personalities of all the staff, the encouragement that we receive and the teamwork the entire staff has. For helping to relieve some of the fear and the stress of going from a wheelchair to walker during my progression. The equipment used to help rebuild the muscles in my body during therapy. The food is well served along with many choices. And the nursing staff is sometimes very understanding and other times not so much due to the fact they don't always know what damages are done to the inside of the body personally. The nursing staff could benefit from further training to better understand personal limitations. I would very much recommend here to others and mainly because after being in other facilities and with my own personal experiences...that after I walked in here I knew I would be able to regain my strength and walk again. I appreciate the staff's encouragement to push harder to progress even if not personally aware of the benefits.

  • Rena Metcalf
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    I was a patient here and have been to many facilities before .Therapist and nurses are very friendly and effecient. They are clear at what their goals are and willing to work around personal schedules. They do a nice job of keeping patient updated on progress. I will likely return for outpatient therapy . I would recommend .

  • meg schmeedafam c
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I would give NEGATIVE stars if I could. If you even SLIGHTLY care about your loved ones, never put them in this place.

  • Gordon Duncan
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Great place to get well. Staff is good well trained. Thank

About Valley Health & Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameValley Nursing, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity150
Residents95
Percent Occupied63%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Valley Health & Rehabilitation

Valley Health & Rehabilitation was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Montana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 15, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that special or therapeutic diets are ordered by the attending doctor.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

February 26, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$6,078 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Valley Health & Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.5%
96.2%
96.2%
96.2%
95.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.8%
98.6%
98.5%
97.1%
91.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.2%
42.0%
39.1%
24.4%
44.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.8%
22.5%
15.9%
11.9%
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.8%
6.6%
14.8%
13.9%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.0%
10.0%
12.3%
8.6%
14.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.0%
11.6%
7.9%
7.6%
15.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.3%
6.9%
4.5%
1.4%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.7%
5.2%
2.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.5%
26.4%
18.4%
8.8%
9.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.2%
5.6%
4.5%
8.7%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9%
5.6%
1.5%
0.0%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
3.5%
3.1%
2.6%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

73.2%
86.9%
82.5%
77.4%
73.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.3%
68.1%
68.1%
68.1%
75.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.4%
64.4%
63.6%
69.6%
70.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.4%
17.6%
17.1%
18.3%
21.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7%
1.8%
4.7%
4.7%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
1.6%
1.2%
0.5%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places