Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Discovery Care Centre Ltd

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Montana (MT)
  4. Hamilton
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Rhonda Hasselfeldt
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father was there when he passed and my mother has spent a month there until she was who enough to come home. They offered dignity when my father passed and that was priceless and my mother got stronger so she could come home. I can't put a value to that.

  • mike paul
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Management is horrible, treating staff like crap, which trickles down treating residents like crap. Administrator Buchiet cares more about money than the residents. Aides during the day are extremely rough. My loved one had skin tears on their arms almost daily. They did not give baths often, maybe 1x in 3 weeks. Extremely unsatisfied. Found mold along the wall but it was just painted over.

  • Robert Curry
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    I stayed at Discovery Care for two weeks to recover from open heart surgery...the staff treated me with kindness and professionalism all the time I was there. The nurses were especially attentive to my needs. A great place! I also noted the personal care the staff gave to the patients in the wing I was in.

  • Brickael Henderson
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    The CNAs are wonderful to the residents and try to make sure all their needs are met.

  • A Google User
    ★★★★★ 5 years ago

    Unprofessional and uncaring, don't trust their word no matter what they say.

About Discovery Care Centre Ltd

General Information

Legal Business NameDiscovery Care Centre Ltd
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 10, 1990 (27 years)
Capacity58
Residents55
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Discovery Care Centre Ltd

Discovery Care Centre Ltd
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Montana Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 26, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$6,078 fine
KSomeImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
HSomeActual HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the facility is administered in an acceptable way that maintains the well-being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.

January 15, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Discovery Care Centre Ltd require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 40min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.3%
60.5%
78.3%
97.6%
91.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
70.0%
70.0%
-
43.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.6%
26.2%
29.5%
30.0%
19.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.6%
15.7%
18.2%
17.8%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.4%
9.3%
4.3%
4.8%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.8%
16.7%
25.6%
0.0%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.6%
7.3%
3.2%
10.8%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.5%
4.7%
15.2%
9.5%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8%
11.8%
13.9%
0.0%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.5%
7.1%
6.8%
12.2%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.4%
4.7%
6.5%
4.8%
4.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
7.0%
6.5%
7.1%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.0%
4.0%
3.0%
4.2%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1%
2.3%
2.2%
2.4%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

64.1%
73.2%
84.6%
80.4%
77.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.3%
90.2%
90.2%
90.2%
76.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
68.3%
-
-
68.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.4%
10.5%
28.6%
-
21.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
1.7%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places