Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Oaks-Brevard

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. North Carolina
  3. Brevard Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • CJ Harmony
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My brother was here for approx 2 months for rehab from leg amputation. He is happy with the care he received and the nurses were very attentive and caring. The head physical therapist made sure his needs were met before he went back home and even came to his house to be sure it was properly equipped for his new life with an artificial leg. His only complaint was the food, but he is a retired chef and is very critical of food prep anyway. I visited him at least once per week and was pleased with his care, but you will find there is no place that is perfect for your loved one, but at home.

  • michelle liggett
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Parking places close to the door are occupied by employees at The Oaks. You need to mark those spots 'Visitors Only.' Our family members who have difficulty ambulating are having to park further away. CNAs, RNs, and others should park in those further away spots. I see this as laziness. The new Oaks Administrator (former military) can make that difference. Stop employees from parking up front.

  • Allan Pack
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I would not recommend sending your loved ones to The Oaks in Brevard and especially not for rehab. They are not equipped to handle rehab patients. My mother in law was there for a week and it was horrible. She did have a few very friendly nurses but they are so short staffed that they cannot adequately give attention to the patients in a timely manner. We had several requests that we mentioned every day but every day they weren't answered. Finally after her Doctor sent a note back that we were not pleased with the care, we finally had someone higher up call and try to fix the problems but this was after being there almost a week! I say all this to warn you that you should not put someone you love in this facility.

  • Joe Joyce
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Rehab. Area is good. Long term rooms are for 2 people and very small. I moved my Aunt to another facility.

  • Lynette Parker
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This facility, staff, and administration are far worse than any Brian Center could ever be!

About The Oaks-Brevard

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Oaks Brevard LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 21, 1994 (26 years)
Capacity120
Residents91
Percent Occupied76%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Oaks-Brevard

The Oaks-Brevard was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 5, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Oaks-Brevard require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 5min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
98.6%
100.0%
93.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
39.4%
47.2%
42.3%
48.1%
56.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.2%
38.7%
44.4%
34.3%
29.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.9%
17.7%
7.4%
8.4%
23.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.1%
13.2%
18.5%
14.5%
13.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.6%
13.7%
6.5%
6.1%
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.2%
2.6%
1.5%
6.7%
8.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
5.2%
6.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
3.4%
0.0%
1.8%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
5.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
2.6%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3%
1.2%
1.4%
5.2%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
2.5%
2.4%
3.3%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.6%
94.3%
93.7%
95.9%
83.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.1%
95.3%
95.3%
95.3%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.0%
56.5%
59.6%
66.5%
65.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
16.2%
16.7%
14.4%
23.3%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
3.8%
5.1%
1.6%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
1.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places