Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Rehab And Hc Ctr At Village Gr

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Fayetteville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I had the opportunity of visiting Village Greene, and found it to be a very nice facility. I found the facility to be clean warm, inviting and the staff was pleasant and polite. Because of this I placed my grandmother there and was please with her room and board. I was able to come and visit at any time and could stay as long as I needed. I also like the fact that I was never turned away and if I needed to leave the facility for something I needed I was surrounded by a variety of stores and restaurants. This made it easy to run out and come right back. After visiting other facilities with the smell meeting me at the door told a story to me in itself. So I was very please and excited to know that my grandmother would be in a clean envioronment with staff that would take care of her. Thank you Village Greene.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Very impressed with the staff and operating system of this facility. I visited my father on numerous occasions and at varying times, because of my busy work schedule. I was so relieved to see that this facility operated continuously in the same manner with professionalism and sincerity, in the care of my father. This is definitely a place were my mind is at ease when a loved one has to be in the care of a knowledgeable staff, with demanding attention. I recommend their facility and services they provide and offer highly to anyone whom needs a short or long term care.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Mother stayed at Village Green for 33 days. We were very pleased with the comfort of her room and the staff. My mom is 85 years old and her 1st choice is always to be at home, but that can't always happen as was this time. She often commented on how good the food was during her stay. Her room was cleaned daily. The most surprising thing was that mom began participating in the social activities. From doing crafts, playing games (bingo was her favorite), or attending afternoon parties she had fun. It was very easy when the family would come by to visit with mom. There was always parking availabile close to the front entrance. The day we picked her up she had a couple of other ladies staying there come by to say goodbye to her. Village Green was our 1st choice and should we need a "home away from home" again it would be our only choice. Thank you to the caring staff.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I would like to say that during my recent stay with this facility after my knee surgery, the staff was very attentive and focused on my well being and recovery. The staff is very pleasant and professional. The facility is clean and the atmosphere is warm and relaxing. Making my recovery a smooth transition. I will use this facility again if the need arises and would absolutely recommend this facility to all of my family and friends.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Village Green, by far, has to be the best Rehab and long term care facility around. My mother had been in and out of facilities over the last several years. She recently passed. Village Green went above and beyond for my mother and my family. I could not imagine a better place or environment. The staff was phenomenal.

About The Rehab And Hc Ctr At Village Gr

General Information

Legal Business NameRehabilitation And Health Care Center At Village Green
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 10, 1991 (26 years)
Capacity170
Residents90
Percent Occupied53%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Rehab And Hc Ctr At Village Gr

The Rehab And Hc Ctr At Village Gr
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 29, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

February 18, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintUse a registered nurse at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

November 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$6,700 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Rehab And Hc Ctr At Village Gr require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.4%
94.9%
94.9%
94.9%
93.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.3%
25.0%
22.6%
25.5%
30.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
41.5%
22.1%
8.7%
5.9%
23.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.5%
2.1%
2.0%
4.3%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.2%
10.6%
4.0%
25.5%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.0%
13.3%
10.2%
2.1%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.0%
20.5%
11.6%
9.8%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7%
4.2%
4.0%
10.6%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4%
9.2%
6.0%
4.6%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.6%
98.8%
100.0%
100.0%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.7%
99.2%
99.2%
99.2%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.1%
53.6%
50.1%
43.2%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.7%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.6%
0.3%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places