Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Brian Ctr Health & Rehab/Gasto

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Gastonia
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I only put one star to be able to write a review. The real rating would be a negative 5 stars. Take what ever means possible to avoid placing your loved ones in this facility. My mother was unable to communicate the neglect she received before being moved to hospice care. Negligent staff, incompetent management, and complete disregard for everyone unfortunate to be living in this prison disguised as a "nursing home"! This facility needs to be shut down forever!

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    By far some of the best staff around. They provide fantastic care to their patients. Check them out.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Pretty good assisted living facility. My company's clients come by to provide support to the residents. Staff is friendly and helpful and there are only and handful of scouting staff, which is a benefit. Other than that it is still an assisted living home.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Never ever let any one tell you that the Brian Center is a good place for you loved one to be. They are the most incompetent bunch of jackasses I have ever seen. The facility is run down. The workers are there for a pay check and bitter. They don't access the patients medical issues nor follow instruction by doctor, nor family. I have witness them take 20 minutes to reach a patient when the call bell is pushed I have seen them use a cream on the bottom of a patient when instructed by the family on 5 occasions not to causing a 2 x 2 bedsore on the patients bottom. Abdominal pain dismissed by Dr and staff telling the patient and family it's was constapation when it was pancreatitis and a blocked liver and would have left her in pain. I.will make sure everyone knows this dump is bad.They packed her stuff up without letting the family know and gave her wheel chair to the rehab facility for other patients to use without our knowledge. AMAZING POS PLACE.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Staff is amazing. They work hard to make me feel at home

About Brian Ctr Health & Rehab/Gasto

General Information

Legal Business NameSsc Gastonia Operating Company LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1977 (40 years)
Capacity162
Residents139
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Brian Ctr Health & Rehab/Gasto

Brian Ctr Health & Rehab/Gasto
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 9, 2016 - 18 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

February 11, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

March 5, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

December 30, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEstablish and follow a written policy that permits a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide timely notification to the resident before transfer or discharge.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintPermit residents to remain in the facility and not be transferred or discharged without adequate reason.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Brian Ctr Health & Rehab/Gasto require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 15min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.9%
90.6%
90.6%
90.6%
93.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
69.4%
71.1%
59.5%
50.0%
55.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.8%
40.4%
39.3%
43.3%
30.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
26.7%
35.5%
22.8%
28.8%
23.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.0%
6.5%
4.3%
2.1%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.2%
21.3%
25.2%
20.9%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8%
0.8%
0.8%
1.6%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.6%
11.7%
7.0%
9.2%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
4.3%
3.4%
3.4%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.8%
1.0%
1.0%
3.8%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
0.9%
1.7%
0.8%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
0.9%
0.7%
1.4%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

90.8%
94.9%
95.5%
92.8%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.2%
88.1%
88.1%
88.1%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.2%
73.0%
78.9%
83.5%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
3.3%
1.5%
3.8%
2.7%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
3.4%
0.9%
2.2%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places