Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

East Carolina Rehab And Wellness

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. North Carolina
  3. Greenville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sharon Mim
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father went in as a rehab patient from the hospital and the rehab staff is very friendly and helpful. After 6 weeks he became a long-term care patient. He was left to sit in wet pants most days. At night when he rang for help, sometimes the aid would walk in turn off the bell and leave without even asking about his need. His meals seldom came in a timely manner and were usually cold. We had Care Plan meetings to discuss his care and nothing ever came from them. I brought to the attention of the administrator many times that the roaches were horrible and was always told that they had just sprayed or they were spraying the next day. There were some staff members that were very loving and caring. Rehab people are great. They have a great deal of staff turnover here. When I decided to move my father to another facility I was told by the activities director that it would be no different anywhere else, sorry to disappoint you but he loves the new facility and is so happy. The administrator never acknowledged my father leaving, even after being there a year. We almost went to another facility that looks beautiful but found out through reviews and research that it was no better than here. That is why I decided to write this review because when the time comes to have to put our family in a facility we want them to be happy and cared for.

  • bad11983 .
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Great place to work!! Supervisor is so understanding!!! Environment is so peaceful and non rushing. ??

  • Zachary Thomason
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    They are very friendly and helpful. The only issue is that the handy capped parking is too far away from the main entrance.

  • robert webbs
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Awful place. Long history of issues. I used to volunteer there, but no more. Look at their CMS survey history. Changing their name does not change their history.

  • Lillian Isreal
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I am new to the area and was advised not to place my mom in this facility. However, my uncle was placed there for rehab and I visited him. I was pleasantly surprised at the friendliness of the staff, the cleanliness of the facility and the overall inviting spirit of this facility. I was told they are now under new management. Needless to say, I am now looking into having my mom reside here. Thank you to Mrs. Moore who facilitated the tour for me. Job well done!

About East Carolina Rehab And Wellness

General Information

Legal Business NameEast Carolina Rehab And Wellness LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 25, 1991 (29 years)
Capacity130
Residents84
Percent Occupied65%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for East Carolina Rehab And Wellness

* Rating not displayedOverall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Rating not displayedStaff Rating
* Rating not displayedRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 31, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

March 19, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$3,238 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of East Carolina Rehab And Wellness require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.8%
96.7%
96.7%
96.7%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.2%
84.3%
91.4%
90.1%
93.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
41.7%
52.0%
62.1%
59.1%
56.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.0%
7.7%
9.0%
10.5%
29.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.6%
4.0%
8.2%
4.4%
23.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.1%
17.3%
17.7%
15.2%
13.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6%
32.4%
27.1%
36.2%
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.9%
4.9%
7.5%
7.9%
8.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.5%
12.1%
8.8%
6.9%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
16.2%
19.0%
16.5%
20.1%
6.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
7.3%
13.8%
5.3%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.2%
1.2%
2.5%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
1.6%
2.2%
2.2%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

81.7%
87.7%
83.9%
81.9%
83.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
82.5%
82.5%
82.5%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
22.3%
30.5%
-
-
65.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
38.6%
35.7%
37.2%
39.6%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
0.0%
3.1%
4.7%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.4%
1.3%
0.0%
2.1%
1.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places