Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Harmony Hall Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Kinston
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Good place to work. Needs more staff, but that won't happen overnight. 98% percent of the residents I looked after were content and satisfied with the care they received. Recommend to new hires and new residents.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I. Love. Working. With. The. Residents. And. Providing. Care. For. Them. They. Are. Jus. Like. One. Of. Ur. Family. Members. At. Home. Could. Use. A. Lil. More. Staff. Tho. But. Even. The. Ones. That. Are. Here. Are. Compassionate. And. Team players. As. Well

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Nice

  • ★★★★★ a week ago

About Harmony Hall Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameRedwood Ltc Group, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 12, 1976 (42 years)
Capacity175
Residents105
Percent Occupied60%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Harmony Hall Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Harmony Hall Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Harmony Hall Nursing And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 10min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.0%
99.2%
99.2%
99.2%
93.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2%
98.2%
99.0%
100.0%
92.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
36.4%
45.7%
-
-
55.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.0%
17.3%
14.7%
14.1%
30.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.2%
14.3%
24.9%
11.5%
23.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.0%
9.3%
11.9%
11.6%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8%
20.7%
41.7%
10.5%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.2%
4.0%
5.0%
2.3%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4%
3.6%
3.8%
9.1%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.0%
7.9%
8.0%
6.2%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.0%
3.0%
6.5%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.5%
1.8%
2.9%
2.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6%
2.4%
1.5%
0.6%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

77.8%
89.7%
89.5%
96.9%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.0%
88.9%
88.9%
88.9%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
79.7%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
39.3%
-
23.1%
22.9%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
4.3%
3.6%
6.4%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places