Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Lexington Health Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Lexington
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Pam Lovell
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The staff from top to bottom are great! Everyone was so caring and friendly. The aides, therapists, nurses, and housekeepers are the best you could ask for. I had 5 broken bones and only one functional limb when I was admitted. The staff did their best to handle me gently and still provide good care and I left in 6 weeks with 3 1/2 functional limbs. I was made to feel like family and made many new friends that I miss seeing since I live in Texas and can't visit frequently. Two down sides: 1. the aides are understaffed and over-worked 2. the food was atrocious. Even with the above down sides, I had a very successful stay and wish to thank everyone involved in my care for your special touch. Happy New Year to you all!!

  • Derek Smith
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The entire staff at LHC is great. They know their profession and they all practice their craft with excellence. I arrived at LHC after having a broken hip set at Baptist Hospital. I live in Lexington and LHC was a convenient drive from our home. The convenience in drive time for my wife and friends benefitted them and me in terms of the encouragement I received. The food was well prepared, with variety and adequate portions. The physical and occupational therapy staff were professional, personable, gentle and firmly encouraging as they worked with me and every patient in their care. The daily goals they set were tailored to the needs of each patient. Their overarching goals are publicly displayed in every room and hallway-to move the patient first into mobility and through each progressive step eventually return him or her to an active and contributing member of the community. I highly recommend LHC as the place to go for physical and occupational therapy. I am now home, stronger and better skilled to care for myself until I'm fully healed.

  • Yvette Valentine
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Very friendly people. Residents and Staff!

  • Steve Musgrave
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    In the years of 2015 and 2016 I did my hip replacement rehab ay Lexington Health Care Center in Lexington, North Carolina. I would score both stays an A+. I received a program that met all my needs for a quick recovery. Everyone there was very friendly and helpful. A daily schedule was given so I new what to expect from day to day The CNA's were very friendly and did a great job of caring for me. The food was good. And the option of dining in room or at the cafeteria was given each day. I would like to give a big thank you to all there who helped me reach my goals. I would highly recommend Lexington Health Care Center to anyone considering a place to help in their recovery. Steve Musgrave

  • Elizabeth Englund
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This facility is the best. The staff are warm and friendly. Great place to come for rehab. Always felt welcome here. I would recommend this facility to everyone.

About Lexington Health Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameMedical Facilities Of America Lxxv (75) Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 21, 1992 (26 years)
Capacity90
Residents83
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Lexington Health Care Center

Lexington Health Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 31, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

July 16, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Lexington Health Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.8%
60.0%
75.0%
76.0%
55.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.2%
38.5%
33.9%
41.5%
30.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.0%
17.6%
30.5%
19.9%
23.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.6%
10.7%
16.7%
15.5%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.9%
14.0%
9.3%
18.4%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
20.2%
15.2%
17.0%
13.7%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.8%
4.8%
6.7%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.9%
11.1%
11.8%
12.5%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.3%
0.0%
6.5%
3.3%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.1%
1.8%
1.6%
0.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
2.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1%
1.8%
1.6%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.5%
100.0%
98.9%
85.2%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.8%
69.9%
69.7%
74.6%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.6%
27.6%
31.8%
27.6%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
2.9%
0.8%
0.8%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places