Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Presbyterian Home Of Hawfields

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Mebane
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About The Presbyterian Home Of Hawfields

General Information

Legal Business NamePresbyterian Home Of Hawfields Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 23, 1991 (26 years)
Capacity117
Residents85
Percent Occupied73%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Presbyterian Home Of Hawfields

The Presbyterian Home Of Hawfields
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 4, 2016 - 8 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

October 2, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Presbyterian Home Of Hawfields require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 50min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
65.0%
69.6%
66.0%
61.2%
55.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.4%
35.8%
29.4%
46.4%
30.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
31.5%
17.7%
22.1%
24.0%
23.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.7%
18.7%
14.5%
18.9%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.1%
18.3%
15.6%
17.6%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.9%
8.7%
11.1%
7.9%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.1%
6.8%
7.8%
10.5%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8%
3.7%
5.5%
4.9%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.1%
4.4%
4.2%
1.4%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.1%
1.4%
6.5%
5.3%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9%
3.9%
2.6%
1.3%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
3.3%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3%
1.3%
1.3%
2.6%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
97.9%
97.9%
98.0%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.5%
55.5%
60.7%
66.0%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
19.8%
20.5%
23.5%
28.8%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
3.1%
3.8%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened