Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Lodge At Mills River

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Mills River
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Jane Hargreaves
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    The Lodge at Mills River helped my dad and me thru a very difficult time. My dad was there twice. The first time for rehab to go home, the second time to care for him until he died. The care they gave to my dad and the comfort they gave to me will be forever appreciated.

  • J Daly
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mom was here for skilled care/rehab. The place is beautiful but the care is not. They were not prepared for skilled care but are more oriented towards rehab for healthier people. My mom was not treated with the dignity and respect that one would hope for in a facility. She got an infection in her leg and, because it was the holidays, they did not attend to it. My family had her sent to the hospital. If we had not done that, she would have passed away, as the infection was that bad. So beware!

  • kathy ronemus
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I cannot say enough good things about my Rehab from a knee replacement. The facilitu,activities, nursing and especially physical therapy were professional and caring. I am so glad that I made the decision to go to the Lodge. I am continuing my outpatient therapy there and am grateful for making great progress.

  • Jennifer Gordon
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    When you arrive at The Lodge you will feel like you are in a resort instead of a rehabilitation center. The food is excellent and you may choose to eat in your room or in the spacious dining area or dine in the enclosed patio. The doctor, nurses, staff, and physical therapists are all wonderful and caring people. The Lodge director comes around and greets you daily. He is a very kind and sweet person. The activities director is so sweet and will make sure you know what activities are available that daily. The Lodge has wonderful furnishing and is very comfortable for guests and patients. You will find sun rooms and living rooms that have couches, chairs, fire places, etc. I was made as comfortable as possible while I recovered from my surgery. I highly recommend The Lodge for Rehabilitation. My experience there was wonderful and I would go back in the future if I need to.

  • Kristin Ingulfsen
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Very beautiful facility paired with caring helpful staff

About The Lodge At Mills River

General Information

Legal Business NameBeystone Health And Rehabilitation Co
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 19, 1986 (31 years)
Capacity50
Residents46
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Lodge At Mills River

The Lodge At Mills River
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 21, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Lodge At Mills River require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 25min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 4hr 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
-
-
-
93.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
100.0%
92.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
30.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
23.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
10.0%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
10.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
0.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
97.3%
97.4%
97.4%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.9%
60.4%
60.4%
69.3%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.5%
0.9%
2.4%
3.2%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6%
1.6%
2.2%
1.1%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.0%
0.3%
0.3%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places