Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Autumn Care Of Raeford

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. North Carolina
  3. Raeford Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sharon Morales
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Rooms not clean bathrooms filthy. Patients left waiting for over 30 minutes after pushing the help button. Left wet for over a hour. Half the staff has a nasty attitude about doing their job

  • Shaquan Anderson
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    I would love to say so yo speak the faculty is some what mean and vile but if ur looking for a great worker call for Tre'ne Hanzy in my opion the best worker out there really show her client's love

  • Alan Davis
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    STAY far, far away from this place o a former inmate, so to speak o NO way to give them 1/2 or 1/4 stars but would if possible!!

  • Tonya Williams
    ★★★★★ in the last week

About Autumn Care Of Raeford

General Information

Legal Business NameAutumn Corporation
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 16, 1988 (31 years)
Capacity132
Residents108
Percent Occupied82%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Autumn Care Of Raeford

Autumn Care Of Raeford was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 21, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$9,920 fine
---Fine$68,426 fine
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

March 10, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

October 31, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

March 24, 2016 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$59,995 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Autumn Care Of Raeford require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.2%
83.9%
83.9%
83.9%
94.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.5%
87.3%
87.0%
64.9%
93.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.0%
-
73.9%
-
56.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.5%
26.0%
21.4%
16.3%
29.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
31.7%
28.0%
33.0%
31.1%
23.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.2%
21.9%
25.5%
19.8%
13.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.2%
21.7%
19.8%
20.5%
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.3%
13.1%
15.3%
13.0%
8.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7%
8.5%
6.6%
2.3%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.4%
12.3%
11.4%
7.0%
6.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.8%
5.1%
5.1%
6.5%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
3.9%
7.0%
7.4%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
3.7%
2.9%
1.9%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

75.6%
65.9%
63.1%
69.5%
83.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.2%
75.3%
75.3%
75.3%
81.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.5%
54.8%
49.7%
59.2%
65.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
31.6%
31.6%
23.8%
15.0%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places