Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Siler City Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Siler City
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Latoria Pettie
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    Too many people at night 25-30+ people heavy and on hall by yourself im fast a good worker neat very clean experience 12+ cna this is just too many every night. I work there a week nobody seem to bother anyone which I hate a place with people that look for trouble and so far they were ok but I do my work so they see me working. If it wasnt for the work load the place would be nice

  • Ken Brower
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Do not allow family members to go to this place. Neglect is widespread spread

  • Desmond Smith
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Just to bad of a place

  • BarbaraGail Brady
    ★★★★★ a year ago

  • Miracle Vernon
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Siler City Center

General Information

Legal Business NameSunbridge Regency - North Carolina, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1980 (38 years)
Capacity150
Residents127
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Siler City Center

Siler City Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 19, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

October 22, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

April 23, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

March 5, 2014 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$229,840 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Siler City Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 50min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.1%
98.4%
98.4%
98.4%
93.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.6%
93.3%
97.4%
97.5%
92.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.2%
65.9%
62.2%
45.5%
55.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.2%
25.5%
21.6%
22.1%
30.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
38.4%
50.1%
32.7%
30.8%
23.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
24.2%
27.0%
25.2%
24.2%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.7%
47.4%
28.6%
27.4%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.0%
10.2%
11.9%
8.6%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.1%
8.5%
12.9%
16.4%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8%
7.2%
4.8%
2.3%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.0%
8.3%
2.7%
5.1%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
2.5%
3.4%
3.3%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.2%
1.4%
2.4%
1.9%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6%
5.9%
4.3%
2.5%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

55.6%
64.3%
71.2%
74.1%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.7%
58.9%
58.9%
58.9%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
72.5%
-
-
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
37.5%
21.7%
17.9%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7%
2.9%
3.4%
6.2%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places