Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Graybrier Nurs & Retirement Ct

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Trinity
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • K K
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    The overall care was excellent. The nurses were compassionate and prompt. The Therapy department was also excellent.

  • Chris A.
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The Graybrier is a wonderful facility. The staff really do go above and beyond to make it a friendly environment. It is never easy when it comes time to choose a facility for short or long term care for a loved one, and I can say I know The Graybrier was the best choice for my loved one and family as a whole. The grass is not always greener on the other side that is for sure; I know this personally and I could not be more satisfied, all places have their drawbacks and "problems", some just focus too much on the negative to see the good that places like The Graybrier are actually doing. I can not thank ALL of the staff enough for ALWAYS going above and beyond each day to help it be a homelike atmosphere for my loved one.

  • John E
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Horrible nursing home! Be prepared for the worst experience of your life. Better hope that there is someone in your family to be an advocate for your loved one. The administration is not very effective and although the place has been upgraded don't let the decor fool you. You will be amazed at how unclean your loved one will be. I marked my mother's sheet and it wasn't changed for over 3 weeks! Staff turnover is unbelievable and they claim that they have a high patient staff ratio. Well, that just isn't true especially on the weekend! Make sure you visit on the weekend if you are thinking about putting your loved one here. Not sure that I would even give this place a star but to share my review I must. You really should just RUN!!!

  • Carla M
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Look somewhere else. Lovely facility, but horrible, awful patient care. Don't let looks deceive you. Staff was uncaring, unfriendly and issues were never addressed. Our loved one was always dirty, as were the sheets, bedspread, etc. Administration needs a complete overhaul.

  • Ashley Lowe
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This facility is a disgrace. I would not recommend sending anyone here, not even my worst enemy. Unless you want them to be neglected, abused, threatened, and/or harassed by staff members and especially the administrator. They are rude. They do not keep family members or residents updated or informed of any insurance changes. They do not do physical therapy like they are supposed to. They will allow someone who is paralyzed to go home to live by themselves with no additional care. If they will do it to my family member they will do it to anyone.

About The Graybrier Nurs & Retirement Ct

General Information

Legal Business NameArchdale Nursing Center Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 8, 1990 (27 years)
Capacity128
Residents106
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Graybrier Nurs & Retirement Ct

The Graybrier Nurs & Retirement Ct
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 31, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Graybrier Nurs & Retirement Ct require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.0%
37.8%
40.0%
45.0%
55.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.4%
41.3%
46.2%
44.3%
30.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.6%
20.7%
13.8%
20.6%
23.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.5%
13.5%
14.6%
12.1%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.1%
46.3%
25.3%
25.9%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.6%
9.5%
17.1%
18.8%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.3%
5.2%
8.3%
12.1%
8.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6%
2.4%
5.1%
10.8%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.2%
10.3%
11.5%
11.1%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.2%
5.2%
2.1%
5.1%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.8%
97.8%
100.0%
100.0%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
97.8%
97.8%
97.8%
81.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.5%
67.2%
56.8%
71.7%
63.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.7%
16.7%
18.3%
17.4%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1%
0.0%
1.9%
1.7%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8%
1.0%
3.5%
4.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NC
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places