Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Miller Pointe, A Prospera Community

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Dakota (ND)
  4. Mandan
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Miller Pointe, A Prospera Community

General Information

Legal Business NameSanford Living Centers
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1991 (26 years)
Capacity114
Residents61
Percent Occupied54%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Miller Pointe, A Prospera Community

Miller Pointe, A Prospera Community
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Dakota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 5, 2016 - 6 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

July 20, 2016 - 8 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

October 8, 2015 - 18 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

November 18, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

August 28, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionGive each resident enough fluids to keep them healthy and prevent dehydration.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

April 8, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Miller Pointe, A Prospera Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

4hr 5min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
10min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 30min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 45min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.1%
98.1%
98.1%
98.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
45.9%
34.5%
42.4%
43.8%
45.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3%
35.4%
25.0%
26.4%
19.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.2%
10.7%
4.4%
8.2%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.0%
17.0%
12.0%
7.8%
17.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.0%
8.9%
9.8%
3.9%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.3%
10.0%
7.9%
11.8%
10.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.0%
4.3%
2.0%
3.9%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.8%
4.3%
2.0%
2.1%
5.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.0%
10.6%
0.0%
11.8%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.7%
2.0%
1.9%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

88.0%
94.9%
100.0%
100.0%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.8%
91.4%
91.4%
91.4%
80.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.9%
62.7%
69.2%
-
77.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.8%
12.5%
13.6%
14.7%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.6%
4.7%
2.8%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ND
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened