Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Lodge At Heritage Estates

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Nebraska (NE)
  4. Gering
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About The Lodge At Heritage Estates

General Information

Legal Business NameHeritage Of Gering, Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 20, 1985 (32 years)
Capacity102
Residents80
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Lodge At Heritage Estates

The Lodge At Heritage Estates
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Nebraska Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 2, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

April 6, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Lodge At Heritage Estates require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 30min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.9%
40.0%
37.3%
31.5%
46.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.1%
17.9%
17.6%
16.2%
21.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
33.5%
31.0%
26.5%
17.1%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.8%
14.7%
18.1%
18.4%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.4%
22.7%
17.6%
12.3%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.4%
7.0%
5.1%
4.6%
10.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.3%
2.9%
6.9%
4.0%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8%
2.0%
1.8%
2.0%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.8%
7.6%
6.0%
2.8%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8%
0.0%
1.4%
6.7%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6%
8.8%
8.3%
6.6%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6%
5.3%
11.4%
13.1%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
98.9%
82.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.7%
97.7%
97.7%
97.7%
79.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.1%
86.0%
84.4%
84.5%
73.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.1%
16.0%
12.5%
13.3%
20.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6%
1.5%
1.4%
2.8%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
1.2%
0.0%
2.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NE
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened