Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Kendal At Hanover

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. New Hampshire (NH)
  4. Hanover
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Christine Schloss
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My aunt, Esther Morris, lived at Kendal for several years in the 2000s until her death. She moved there to be closer to her daughter & for Alzheimer's care for her husband Mark. I visited her there several times. Kendal was very accommodating to their needs for different levels of care and accommodations. After Mark's death, my aunt, who had been a docent in Santa Barbara, gave tours of the artwork that residents hung in the hallways near their doors. Thus, she was able to have the kind of community interactions that they had enjoyed in California. If I had a daughter living near there, I'd move to Kendal myself.

  • Katherine Quinn
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I would give a zero if I could. My grabdparents have been here for forever. The farm house sucks. The rules change regularly. It's insane. The beds are horrible. I had to go see a chiropractor after our visit. The farm house stay is over 200 a night. You apparently get meals at the caffe but we never got one meal. We were made to be an info vinence the entire time. It was stupid. Do not stay here. Days in is 79 dollars a night. Go elands here

  • Bill Dalrymple
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Decent pay and benifits but ALOT of silly politics.Half the kitchen staff failed the simple serv safe test 6 mos ago in 2017 when I was there.Can't speak of the care but future kitchen experienced applicants BEWARE!!I was hired by an actual chef and when he left we were supposed to have a vote on who we wanted in house to replace him.When word got out we were gonna write the name in of a cook who was 10 times more qualified and 20 times more liked than the eventual unqaulified unprofessional sous chef who ended up getting the job we weren't allowed to vote and that's not the way to run a successful kitchen.Very sad because this place if run properly had a lot of potential

  • Stuart Corpieri
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Housing for the elderly

  • Denis Mironov
    ★★★★★ a month ago

About Kendal At Hanover

General Information

Legal Business NameKendal At Hanover
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 13, 1992 (26 years)
Capacity5
Residents3
Percent Occupied60%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Kendal At Hanover

Kendal At Hanover
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New Hampshire Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Data Not Available

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
97.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
98.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
45.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
20.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
21.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
8.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
87.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
87.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
71.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places