Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Elms Of Cranbury, The

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. New Jersey
  3. Cranbury Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Erica Serrano
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I just want to say how much I really appreciate the people at The Elms. My grandmother has been in their Long Term Care for over 6 months and it has been great. It's been a learning process and a big adjustment for us all but we can't think of a nicer and cleaner place for our grandmother to live. She was previously living at another facility and I can definitely notice the difference in appearance and cleanliness. I would recommend The Elms to any needing Rehab or Long Term Care.

  • Eric Wolff
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This place is the best. Beautiful grounds, rooms, and amenaties. All the staff I've met are friendly and professional. Everything is clean and neat. The dining room is elegant and the service is excellent. They really make it feel like you are in a high end hotel, and not a convalescent center. I would highly recommend them for there quality of service, and the feeling of not being in a depressing place.

  • Ironman Rules
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Do not bring your family here Staff is unprofessional and also are not take care of residents with respect. And also not treating coworkers respect at all , And also a lot of drama do not work here.

  • Ray Beharry
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My Dad stayed at the Elms of Cranbury after having a stroke and being discharged from the hospital. The staff was friendly, courteous and attentive. I felt as though they didn't treat my dad as a patient, but as a person. He was very happy there, made friends with staff and other residents, and truly felt at home. He even knew some on a first name basis, and I often found him joking with his care givers. I would highly recommend the Elms to anyone who wants a elcoming environment to care for their loved ones.

  • Kimberly C
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Both of my grandparents were here and our experience was excellent. In difficult times, it was so comforting to know our family was safe and so well cared for. I can't recommend the Elms of Cranbury enough!

About Elms Of Cranbury, The

General Information

Legal Business NameCranbury Healthcare Center, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 20, 1998 (22 years)
Capacity120
Residents117
Percent Occupied98%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Elms Of Cranbury, The

Elms Of Cranbury, The was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New Jersey Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 6, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Elms Of Cranbury, The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 25min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.4%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
96.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
28.1%
35.5%
31.2%
39.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.5%
16.7%
15.7%
15.4%
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
3.6%
3.1%
10.5%
14.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.3%
20.7%
16.4%
7.7%
11.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.0%
7.8%
6.5%
6.2%
11.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.2%
3.8%
8.9%
5.8%
6.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.6%
6.2%
11.9%
10.6%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.2%
13.0%
7.7%
7.4%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
0.0%
3.8%
5.2%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1%
5.2%
1.8%
5.2%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
3.1%
3.9%
1.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8%
6.9%
9.1%
10.3%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
99.8%
89.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.8%
94.7%
94.7%
94.7%
88.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
38.3%
41.7%
47.1%
54.7%
71.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
12.1%
10.7%
7.9%
5.6%
6.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.5%
1.1%
1.4%
1.2%
1.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.2%
2.7%
2.1%
1.7%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places