Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regency Grande Nurs & Rehab Ce

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. New Jersey (NJ)
  4. Dover
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • William Hays
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Hi Mr. Olszewski. My mother Catherine Hays finally went home on 7/5 after a lengthy stay at Regency. She is a "repeat customer" having been with you folks on 4 or 5 different occasions in the past. I just wanted to send you a short note about your facility and staff. I am of the age where many of my friends are going through the same challenges as I am with their parents. When they ask me about a facility I always sing Regency Grande's praises. Your facility is clean, warm and inviting and your staff are professional, caring and kind. Jennifer Bollard in particular is great at her job and a true professional. She guided us though some uncharted waters with a steady and even hand and her advices were invaluable. Congratulations on running such a class organization and your selection of qualified and caring people. Sincerely, Bill Hays and the entire Hays Family.

  • Walt Matth
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Recently, I was fortunate to stay at this facility in dover for a 7 week rehab stay. Without the slightest hesitation i can say that The Regency Grande Nursing and Post-acute Rehabilitation Center stands alone and high above my several other previous rehab experiences. The physical plant is akin to a new and well maintained hotel, most comfortable and pleasant accommodations and entertaining and well coordinated activities. The therapists and caregivers were phenomenal as well. This is a 5 star facility.

  • Mary Ann Van Orden
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    This is the second time we used your facility and the second time is right now. We chose you twice because of the care my husband received the first time. Your staff took good care of him which allowed him to be able to continue his physical and occupational therapy until he reached his goal. The people in Regency treat you like they want you to achieve your goal and go home feeling accomplished in a timely manner, leaving behind friends and very qualified nurses, aides and therapists, who show their appreciation for your hard work. This time, the staff, most of whom are still there, greeted him with open arms and smiles because they didn't forget him and they like patients who try hard to get better. The way they work, to get you out of bed as soon as you can, is encouragement for the patients to work hard to get back home. I have no trouble telling anyone who asks about a place that gives good care, it's Regency. Since I go there everyday to be with my husband, I feel like family because it's a friendly and competent rehab Center. Mary Ann Van Orden

  • George Lewis
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My mother-in-law was admitted to Regency Grand for rehabilitation after being transferred from another facility which was sub par to say the least. I cannot find fault with any aspect of the center; in fact it exceeded our expectations on every level. Every staff member we interacted with from admissions, nursing, aides, physical therapists, social services was beyond professional. The nursing staff and aides really CARED about my family members' well being. We spent a lot of time there at all hours of the day and night and never noticed any resident being neglected, left alone or calling out. The facility is clean, orderly and very comfortable as it was once The Dutton Hotel. It actually retains that charm and doesn't feel like a nursing home. I felt very secure leaving my mom in their care and have since recommended it to a friend who is checking in today.

  • Irina Slosberg
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Dear staff, We wanted to personally thank each one of the many individuals that assisted us with my fathers problems during his stay with you. Your attention and sincere care for Lev has given him a new lease on life. He was not able to do almost anything and now he is at least able to care for himself because of your rehabilitation center. Special thanks to Carla, Darlene, Jennifer, Jill, Marlyn and Kettellie for your special attention and understanding. Have a wonderful Holiday and a Happy New Year to you all.

About Regency Grande Nurs & Rehab Ce

General Information

Legal Business NameRegency Grande Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 1996 (21 years)
Capacity155
Residents154
Percent Occupied99%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regency Grande Nurs & Rehab Ce

Regency Grande Nurs & Rehab Ce was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New Jersey Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 22, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regency Grande Nurs & Rehab Ce require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.6%
99.3%
99.3%
99.3%
96.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
42.2%
42.2%
39.3%
36.5%
40.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.6%
9.4%
9.2%
7.6%
21.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
3.2%
6.2%
4.4%
6.5%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.5%
6.8%
6.8%
6.0%
12.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.3%
4.8%
4.0%
11.2%
12.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.7%
13.8%
7.2%
5.9%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.5%
2.3%
6.8%
3.8%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4%
3.3%
4.3%
1.1%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.1%
5.6%
5.4%
4.7%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.9%
2.3%
5.3%
3.8%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
1.5%
2.2%
2.2%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.3%
0.7%
0.7%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.1%
100.0%
99.0%
95.8%
87.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.2%
96.8%
96.8%
96.8%
86.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.1%
78.6%
76.8%
72.4%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
16.2%
13.8%
13.5%
8.5%
8.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
0.0%
1.2%
1.1%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4%
1.6%
0.6%
0.6%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places