Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. New Jersey (NJ)
  4. Lakewood
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Clean , friendly staff , they took amazing care of my mom post heart attack

  • ★★★★★ 7 years ago

    When my father was recently in need of care and treatment in a long-term care facility, my mother, myself, and one of my sisters visited several nursing homes in the Lakewood, NJ area. We selected Leisure Chateau based on cleanliness, warmth and professionalism of the staff to whom we were introduced, and the administrator's availability to answer questions prior to my father's placement there. We were also impressed with the effort that had been made to create an aesthetically pleasing environment, thinking this might be a reflection of the level of care provided. As a Licensed Clinical Social Worker providing mental health services to nursing home residents (in another state), I have a frame of reference with which to evaluate the quality of care my father received at Leisure Chateau. And during the months my father was there, what my family and I observed was above and beyond anything we could have possibly expected or hoped for. First and foremost, the dedication and professionalism of the staff were exemplary. The CNAs treated my father with the utmost kindness and respect. The nurses were proactive and responsive, as were the nursing supervisors, who maintained excellent communication with our family. The Rehab department was dedicated and provided personalized treatment seven days a week. Leisure Chateau has a Concierge on staff who attends to the needs of family members, as well as the residents. Our family appreciated knowing that any time my mother was visiting my Dad, the Concierge would check in on her to see if she would like something to eat or drink. The administrator was visible, highly involved with the operation of the facility, and continued to be accessible to our family throughout my father's stay. Sadly, my father's illness turned out to be terminal. However, my family's deep sadness at losing my father was mitigated by the knowledge that the care he received in his final days was kind and compassionate. We are beyond grateful to the many wonderful individuals who provided such loving care to my father and we cannot say enough about the excellence of this facility.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

About Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameLeisure Chateau Acquisition LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 28, 1982 (36 years)
Capacity242
Residents212
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation

Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New Jersey Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 16, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

January 9, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 60min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.2%
95.5%
95.5%
95.5%
96.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.7%
96.8%
97.9%
95.6%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
19.2%
22.7%
22.7%
37.0%
40.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.0%
32.0%
34.3%
33.3%
21.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.8%
26.8%
17.3%
22.3%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.9%
11.7%
14.2%
18.1%
12.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.2%
18.1%
11.3%
11.9%
12.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.5%
5.8%
3.3%
1.4%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.8%
10.3%
7.7%
6.6%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3%
2.8%
5.7%
8.4%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
1.2%
0.0%
1.2%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5%
1.1%
3.3%
1.1%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
1.1%
0.0%
1.1%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.0%
2.6%
2.1%
1.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.1%
9.7%
12.3%
13.1%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

74.9%
87.0%
83.6%
80.4%
87.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.5%
86.9%
86.9%
86.9%
86.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.2%
59.3%
83.5%
93.5%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.0%
6.6%
1.0%
0.9%
8.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9%
1.0%
3.3%
3.1%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
1.8%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places