Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Chestnut Hill Conv Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. New Jersey (NJ)
  4. Passaic
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    I loved working there . They are the best. Caring for all. Love

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    My sister was admitted 2 weeks ago, I'm so happy with the staff, the dr , the Pt Staff . Special thanks to the people on front desk, and all the staff.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My mother stayed there several years ago. She had a stroke and was very ill, and they were very kind and took good care of her. PT was great and they gave her hope. I also like the spiritual activities that is provided for residents.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    my mother was just admitted there and while i'm writing this i'm on hold for 10 minutes Nobody there is trying to help, very very very poor facility

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Staff, Doctors, overall service excellent.

About Chestnut Hill Conv Center

General Information

Legal Business NameChestnut Hill Convalescent & Rehabilitation Center
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 1, 1968 ()
Capacity111
Residents88
Percent Occupied79%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Chestnut Hill Conv Center

Chestnut Hill Conv Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New Jersey Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 10, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

September 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Chestnut Hill Conv Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
96.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
40.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.4%
14.3%
12.1%
13.6%
21.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.6%
17.3%
9.7%
27.3%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.1%
7.3%
5.3%
5.3%
12.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.9%
14.3%
17.5%
23.3%
12.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9%
16.1%
3.6%
5.2%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.3%
14.0%
12.5%
2.0%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6%
5.4%
5.5%
5.2%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
1.8%
1.7%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
2.3%
1.2%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.3%
98.5%
99.3%
99.2%
87.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
97.0%
97.0%
97.0%
86.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.0%
78.2%
87.0%
86.0%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
3.9%
6.9%
5.0%
3.3%
8.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3%
1.0%
0.0%
2.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
0.0%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places