Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Parker At Mccarrick

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. New Jersey (NJ)
  4. Somerset
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Nikki Butkiewicz
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    The place is very clean and smells good. The staff cares very much for their charges. They strive to interact with the residents whether or not there is any evidence the person is aware. That's kindness.

  • Kristin Dougherty
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Very nice place was clean, staff was very nice and caring.

  • Annette Shadiack
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    This is a dreary looking place staff do not seem happy to be there.

  • susan Rhodes
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Quality care. Clean nice staff

  • Delta Diplomat
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    My family member's care has been satisfactory. Unfortunately, my experience with the administration of Parker at McCarrick has been very unsatisfactory. McCarrick gave me incorrect information regarding the Medicaid application. McCarrick failed to bill the long term care insurance company, despite telling me that they would do so. This created a lot of extra work for me. Despite multiple requests, McCarrick failed to place me on the family notification list. I have spoken to Parker executive leadership about it, and hope the issue is now resolved. My greatest concern is the extremely limited number of attending physicians available to care for long term care residents. At this time there is only one physician accepting patients other than the interim medical director. A new medical director is expected to start in November. Executive leadership has stated that there are no plans to bring any more physicians on board. Subsequently, I was told I am permitted to select a physician from the community, provided he/she can be credentialed by Parker. This is a burdensome task, especially since I do not know what Parker's physician requirements are. In my opinion, family members should not be responsible for recruiting attending physicians.

About Parker At Mccarrick

General Information

Legal Business NameParker At Mccarrick Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 15, 1988 (30 years)
Capacity120
Residents109
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Parker At Mccarrick

Parker At Mccarrick was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New Jersey Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 29, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Parker At Mccarrick require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
-
-
-
96.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
-
100.0%
100.0%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.0%
-
65.2%
-
40.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.2%
-
21.3%
20.0%
21.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.7%
-
8.7%
34.7%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.8%
-
11.2%
11.5%
12.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.2%
-
1.5%
10.6%
12.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.4%
-
1.3%
1.3%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
-
4.7%
7.3%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.0%
-
2.6%
2.6%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.2%
-
3.5%
7.3%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
-
1.2%
1.2%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4%
-
3.9%
2.3%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.3%
99.6%
98.8%
98.9%
87.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.7%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
86.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.0%
54.5%
62.1%
69.2%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.9%
7.7%
10.8%
10.9%
8.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.7%
0.8%
0.7%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.4%
0.9%
1.1%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places