Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Care One At Teaneck

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. New Jersey
  3. Teaneck Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • feelflowfree
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My father stayed at Care One in Teaneck for 3 weeks and had an amazing experience. Irene in admissions was like an angel. She knew exactly what to do and say to make me feel comfort in knowing that my father would be well taken care of. Rachel, my father's RN also went above and beyond in caring for my father's needs. The PT's, especially Manny and Rob positively encouraged my father to do the necessary work to get better. All the nurses were very kind. Therese was a nurse who also went above and beyond to make my father feel comforted. The facilities were pristine and set up to be very warm and welcoming. I highly encourage anyone to check out this facility. You will not be disappointed.

  • Barbara Portelli
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I went to visit my friends mother at Care One Teaneck a few times and I was very impressed by her progress with her shoulder therapy. A little hesitant about kosher food, however Dennis the director of kitchen assured me that my experience would surprise me. The quality of food was nothing short of a 5 star restaurant, and the overall ambience was extremely impressive and i would refer Care one Teaneck to any family and friends.

  • Yosef Zarnighian
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I have served as the Rabbi of Careone of Teaneck for almost a year now. The staff does a wonderful job at ensuring proper care and treatment for all their patients. This facility offers excellent kosher meals, and their physical therapy program has been positively reviewed by every patient I have met in the program.

  • Elan Forman
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    If I can give more stars, I would. The entire Care One staff has really lived up to there name-- each one of you have been so caring and compassionate during this most difficult time for my mother who has been suffering through her illness as well as our family. We really cannot thank each and every one of you enough for making my mother feel so comfortable. All the way from the cook, Dennis, to each one of the aides, to all of the nurses, the maintenance staff, as well as the very special chaplain, Rabbi Feurestein--each one of you have been a gem and we will be forever grateful and indebted to you. Thank you all so much...

  • Abe Israel
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I was extremely impressed with Avi the mashgiach or rabbi yesterday. He was so sweet and warm to my aunt and was able to calm her down after having a challenging day. He exudes warmth and patience and the best this facility has to offer.

About Care One At Teaneck

General Information

Legal Business NameCare One At Teaneck, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 13, 2007 (13 years)
Capacity128
Residents113
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Care One At Teaneck

Care One At Teaneck was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New Jersey Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 13, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

December 9, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$20,505 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Care One At Teaneck require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA

50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
1hr 40min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
5hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
96.3%
96.3%
96.3%
96.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
39.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
17.4%
20.0%
-
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
14.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.0%
20.8%
21.7%
14.3%
11.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
9.5%
-
-
11.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.0%
4.3%
9.1%
4.8%
6.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
0.0%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
4.8%
5.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
8.3%
8.7%
9.5%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
3.4%
3.6%
17.5%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.1%
99.2%
99.2%
99.2%
88.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.9%
67.9%
62.9%
58.7%
71.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
1.0%
2.0%
1.2%
0.4%
6.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8%
0.5%
0.6%
0.9%
1.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.4%
0.2%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017NJ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places