Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Lea Regional Medical Center - Transitional Care Un

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. New Mexico (NM)
  4. Hobbs
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Tom Hanks
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    This place gets negative stars. A long time ago we had taken my grandma here because she was pissing blood, pooping blood, and literally throwing up chunks of blood and the idiot doctors there diagnosed her with ulcers well she never got any better there so we decided to take her out and take her to Lubbock instead. Once we told the staff we were moving her they became extremely hateful and rude toward us and told us that we didnt need to take her to Lubbock because all she had was ulcers well once we got to Lubbock the doctors immediately diagnosed her with cirrhosis of the liver and told us that she only had a week left to live talk about being pissed off. Now the reason I'm writing today is because another one of my family members was rushed into the ER because he had a small stroke and these incompetent "doctors" let him out the same day with a high dangerous blood pressure (not to mention he's a severe diabetic) and they didnt even have the audacity of wheeling him out in a wheel chair they made him just walk out on his own two feet. How sorry of a place can this really be. If I was you I wouldn't trust anyone there with any of my family members lives.

  • Gale Palmer
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Brought my husband here to Emergency with high blood pressure and dizziness, they took him right in, got him all hooked up to everything, doctor came right in and checked him. he ordered blood work, Xrays his chest, EKG, kept him hooked up to a monitor, have him fluid. They gave him excellent care.

  • Juan Galindo
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    These place receives no stars been her five f'n hours to be told to go to the ER in Albuquerque when I get there to be double checked wtf???? Why is this place open??

  • Julian Moreno
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    This hospital is terrible my wife was having a misscariage we waited a hour and 45 minutes to be seen by a doctor. When they gave us a room it took another hour for a doctor to come see my wife.(A day before this happened my wife went to the clinic and heard my child's heart beat.) They took a ultrasound and told my wife our child was gone. Then when they left, they came back and had the nerve to tell my wife there was no baby growing in her. After her surgery to remove where our child was growing, the look she had broke my heart. No woman should go threw this. Please don't trust this hospital staff are lazy and doctors dont deserve there degree.

  • Cori Gore
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    So far things have been great. We went to nor lea in lovington and the ER was amazing but once my daughter got admitted it was awful, so we came here and now I would come here before I would go to lovington again.

About Lea Regional Medical Center - Transitional Care Un

General Information

Legal Business NameLea Regional Hospital LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 22, 1994 (23 years)
Capacity16
Residents5
Percent Occupied31%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Lea Regional Medical Center - Transitional Care Un

Lea Regional Medical Center - Transitional Care Un
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New Mexico Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 23, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Data Not Available

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
90.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
82.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
42.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
18.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
21.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
11.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.2%
96.7%
98.4%
100.0%
68.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
96.7%
96.7%
96.7%
67.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.1%
54.3%
59.3%
64.2%
61.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
31.5%
23.5%
27.1%
28.3%
23.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.0%
4.2%
2.1%
2.3%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
2.9%
1.5%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NM
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places