Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rosewood Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Nevada (NV)
  4. Reno
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Theresa Walker
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    After having an unfortunate accident , was told that I needed additional therapy. I chose to go to Rosewood. It was a very pleasant experience and since then I have had to enter into a skilled nursing facility twice more. Rosewood has been my choice each time. I have received excellent care and the staff has always been compassionate, caring and educational. I would highly recommend Rosewood to anyone .

  • Dianne Isom
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    An absolutely phenomenal center, I appreciate the genuine care they take for all of their patients!

  • Kenneth Brown
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    After having 2 heart attacks then falling & braking many ribs I was flown to Saint Maries Hospital 3 hours south, for a week, then transfired to Rose Wood Rehab, for 2 more weeks. At first I wondered, then I knew I was in good hands when the Nurces & Physical Therapy folks, came in to interview me. It wasent long before I felt cared for & my needs were ment as far as getting back in the swing of life. From the front desk, Nayome, Cindy, Nichole & Pat were above & behond the call of kindness & duity. Will never forget my experance at Rose Wood Rehab. Kenny Brown

  • Ray Astiasuain
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My name is Ray Astiasuain. I want to express to you how grateful I am for my stay with Rosewood Rehabilitation Center. Dr. Omara with Reno Orthopedic Center rescued me with a hip replacement surgery. Rosewood Rehabilitation Center provided me with excellent care during my recovery. I was very impressed with the medical assistance given to me by your very professional medical staff. The facility was always clean and very organized. My medications were properly distributed and your personnel always made sure I was clean and comfortable. I received very well-balanced meals that were very tasty. The nurses were able to issue snacks when I requested them. Your physical therapists made sure I exercised and took adequate walks. My energy level was very well maintained thanks to the great healthcare I received. My compliments to all of Rosewood Rehab Center who have made it the success it is. All of you made me feel a wellness that can only be obtained through excellent healthcare. Thank you very much, Sincerely, Ray P. Astiasuain

  • kristi white
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    They are the worst place to have a love one. They don't care about the people. While my dad was there he told me people took his things. Well they did and it was his wedding ring. He passed away and I just want it back. :( they never answer the phones and the care is terrible. Many times I would help the patients cuz the stupid employees wouldn't. They just need to be shut down. I would give them a 0 in everything they do. Terrible terrible place to put your love one.

About Rosewood Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameWildcreek Healthcare, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 1, 1970 (47 years)
Capacity99
Residents70
Percent Occupied71%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rosewood Rehabilitation Center

Rosewood Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Nevada Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 11, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

September 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rosewood Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 30min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.9%
98.1%
98.1%
98.1%
90.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
85.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
45.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.7%
25.0%
28.9%
21.1%
25.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.7%
14.8%
26.1%
17.1%
21.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.2%
18.6%
13.0%
10.0%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.9%
12.5%
9.1%
7.9%
16.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.0%
2.3%
0.0%
5.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.3%
2.1%
4.7%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
2.3%
0.0%
2.3%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.0%
97.0%
96.1%
95.8%
75.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.7%
94.7%
94.7%
94.7%
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.7%
57.0%
49.5%
50.8%
58.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
1.8%
2.8%
1.9%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
0.5%
0.5%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places