Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Manor Care Health Services Wingfield Hills

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Nevada (NV)
  4. Sparks
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    My sister has been a patient at Manorcare for close to a month now. She has a large private room. They offer games, movies, and church services. The staff is wonderful! The nurses are caring and patient. The CNAs are attentive, loving, and kind. If her CNA is busy with another patient, a CNA assigned elsewhere will come in to help...they work great as a team! I've had the pleasure to sit in on her therapies with PT and Speech, Vanessa and Kirby, who I have watched lovingly support her, guide her, and cheer her on! This has been a hard road for my sister, but the staff at Manorcare have really helped in making the recovery process a positive one.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Do your loved ones a favor.... Just hit them over the head with a shovel and bury them!!! For ten thousand dollars a month it's not worth it..... They get there food from dumpsters and feed it to these poor people...

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    The nurses are top notch. 98% of the CNAs are great. But the food is the absolute WORST on the planet. I lost so much weight out there, at one time there was talk of putting a feeling tube in me. Because of the food, avoid this place like the plague. I have chronic pressure sores, so unfortunately I've been in several nursing homes over the years. If food is important to you and your loved ones, avoid this place like the plague if at all possible.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Horrid!! This place is NOT for rehab its a place to send your loved one to die!!! My daughter broke me out after one nite. The bed was a torture rack, a old woman screamed for her Grandpa for SEVEN straight hours!! The dinger to go potty went off for ninety minutes~ My meds were not delivered when scheduled. Renown should be ASHAMED to even be a part of this dump! Never ever going back! No way no how! This is totally an insurance scam between Renown and these people.

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Go to morningstar

About Manor Care Health Services Wingfield Hills

General Information

Legal Business NameManorcare Health Services LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 3, 2010 (8 years)
Capacity120
Residents110
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Manor Care Health Services Wingfield Hills

Manor Care Health Services Wingfield Hills
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Nevada Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 27, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide written records when a resident is transferred or discharged.

January 28, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

August 25, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

February 26, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Manor Care Health Services Wingfield Hills require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 60min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
90.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.0%
93.9%
88.1%
87.9%
85.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
45.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.4%
21.7%
19.6%
30.4%
25.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.3%
14.3%
24.3%
13.7%
21.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.6%
12.8%
16.1%
13.1%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.2%
4.7%
10.2%
7.3%
16.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.5%
9.7%
30.7%
37.0%
10.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
6.2%
1.8%
6.2%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
5.9%
4.8%
2.2%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
15.9%
4.2%
0.0%
2.1%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.0%
10.4%
8.8%
3.1%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6%
4.1%
3.4%
1.5%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.9%
8.0%
4.4%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

54.8%
55.8%
50.9%
46.8%
75.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
56.9%
57.9%
57.9%
57.9%
76.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.7%
73.8%
78.8%
61.9%
58.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
31.2%
25.0%
33.1%
39.7%
16.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
2.9%
1.1%
1.2%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.2%
0.5%
0.2%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NV
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places