Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Vincent De Paul Residence

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. New York (NY)
  4. Bronx
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Chrissy
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    I did my CNA externship there and it was the first clean and welcoming nursing home I've ever been to in NYC. In 2016 my aunt fell and died in a nursing home in the Bronx, so I had very low expectations for this nursing home. Well boy was I in for a big surprise! From the time I entered the nursing home, I felt welcomed. The guy at the front desk greeted me kindly, and the waiting area was very clean. Our instructor Azary Tamarov (one of the best human beings I've met) showed us around and instruct us about our task. The staff there were like family. I love how they knew all of their patients needs and desires, how they interacted with the patients, very nice people. They showed us the ropes and educated us about different things we hadn't learned in school. Overall the experience was great. Everyone there was great, especially my instructor Azary Tamarov. He's a very informative, helpful, laid back gentleman. He's a great Instructor. I would recommend St. Vincent De Paul Residence to anyone doing their externships, patients, families, and future employees.

  • Yvette Fernandez
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The staff are GREAT! I haven't had any complaints with the way they care for my family member. Very clean facility and a friendly atmosphere. Thank you St. Vincent the paul.

  • Windsor Sterling
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother was abused by the overnight shift. They would pinch her and she had bruises on her legs and arms as they would pinch her to to keep her quiet. They would also overdose her on pain killers so she would not complain and was incoherent most of the time. When we figured out what they were doing to her we stayed overnight and not one nurse entered the room all night to check on her but, in the morning, came in and filled out her chart showing she was checked on every hour during the night. We took her home to New Jersey. There was NOTHING in this nursing home that resembled any type of care one would expect from the Catholic Church. Inadequate, downright abusive care. Don't bring your parents or loved one here for hospice care as the guilt of having my mom in this place was overwhelming when she died at home. There needs to be a FULL investigation of this nursing home.

  • Emmanuel Campos
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    They treated my grandmother very well. When she passed they were very respectful and helped us through the process.

  • Carmen Colon
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My grandmother died because of their neglect. She developed an infection in her lungs because they failed to keep her mouth clean. I could go on and on about the details, but I'll leave it at that.

About St Vincent De Paul Residence

General Information

Legal Business NameSt Vincent De Paul Residence
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 29, 1992 (25 years)
Capacity200
Residents119
Percent Occupied60%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Vincent De Paul Residence

St Vincent De Paul Residence
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New York Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 23, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that doctors see a resident's plan of care at every visit and make notes about progress and orders in writing.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Vincent De Paul Residence require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.8%
88.6%
88.6%
88.6%
96.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.8%
85.8%
91.1%
90.3%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
26.1%
22.2%
32.0%
33.3%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.0%
15.8%
10.7%
10.6%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.8%
15.2%
11.8%
9.6%
16.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.0%
1.0%
3.9%
5.0%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.2%
11.2%
7.7%
12.2%
14.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9%
3.9%
2.0%
4.0%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2%
7.3%
6.0%
4.7%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
3.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9%
1.8%
0.9%
0.9%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

57.1%
57.1%
51.2%
36.4%
81.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.9%
73.5%
73.5%
73.5%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.9%
-
-
-
66.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
0.0%
0.0%
11.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places