Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Parker Jewish Institute For H C & Rehab

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. New York (NY)
  4. New Hyde Park
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    ******Do Not send your love one here the place is dirty the nursing care is horriable... They force your love ones to were a diapers the adminstration / social work and nurse manger are clueless staff is rude the place smells like urine. They never clean the rooms minus the 1floor. Pt who can walk are forced to sit in wheelchairs and wait days for PT to start. Please run from this place. It needs to be shut down. It is not apart of northwell system they just happen to share the lot space.

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    My grandfather's stay there was a horrible experience. No matter what time of the day that you call to check on your loved ones, no one answers the phone. I actually had to contact another nurse's station just so they can send someone to tell them to pick up. The evening that I finally got a hold of someone, they were rude when I complained & hung up the phone on me when I asked to speak with the nurse manager. The evening that I came to visit, I observed 3 staff members sitting at the nurse's station while a patient's call bell was going off. I got mad after 5-10 minutes & asked them if no one was going to move & find out what the patient wanted. The nurse & the "new" nurse (first day on the job) didn't answer the call bell either! My grandfather came there for rehab on a Friday & ended up being intubated in the ICU by Tuesday for aspiration pneumonia due to the negligence of the staff. When I came to make a complaint, the nurse manager had the nerve to ask me if my grandfather had a stroke that I didn't know about. This facility needs to either re-train their staff in professsionalism when speaking on the phone & when dealing with patient's & their families. They also need to get better staff that actually have compassion & not just coming to work for a paycheck!

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Sadly I did not see these reviews until it was too late. My mom was in for 8 days and I had to remove her after she fell. She has dementia and was in for rehab after being hospitalized for 15 days, as she had trouble walking. After calling them their emergency number the day before (after walking in an finding her halfway in a wheel chair that she managed to get in herself, they still did nothing to prevent her from getting out of bed and falling. They aids and nurses try their best but they do not have enough staff or equipment at night to monitor everyone, especially if they cannot help themselves.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Message to the VP - I am from and live in The UK. A poor, poorly friend of mine is currently a patient here- with a restricted movement, poor health and significant dependancy on support., requiring critical care. Understanding about the purpose of this centre I am truly grateful that such a centre exist and commend their purpose. I have not witnessed, face to face yet the quality of care provided at this centre. However, I am in regular, daily contact with my friend over the phone. What I have been able to identify is a lack of compassion from the care/support staff? I hear my friend often pleading the support staff to help him with a glass of water, as he is unable to lift the glass. He has to, at times wait for hours before anyone helps him, begging them and at times asking visitors to other patients help him drink water. This is despite the nurses/carers being within 3-4 seconds from where my friend's bed is. I feel this is very inhumane. Not giving water to a thirsty being is one of the biggest sins, in all religions. I do realize, appreciate a carers, nursing job is not everyone's cup of tea, and that the stress level that come along in the job is enormous to say the least. I am not here to critcise the centre but I need to urge the exec team, especially the VP to address this issue please. Thank you

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I didn't want to believe the horrible reviews when a family member was sent here - but they are correct. i have been in the medical field (nursing) for 20 years and this place is by far one of the worst facilities I have had the displeasure of interacting with. Some of the direct patient care staff do have some compassion, however the administration, managers and supervisors are reprehensible in the way they treat not only the patients but their families as well. If you have any other options - do not let your family member stay here.

About Parker Jewish Institute For H C & Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameParker Jewish Institute For Health Care And Rehabilitation
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 14, 1972 (46 years)
Capacity527
Residents486
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasParti

Ratings for Parker Jewish Institute For H C & Rehab

Parker Jewish Institute For H C & Rehab
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of New York Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 6, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

January 26, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

April 16, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Parker Jewish Institute For H C & Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.2%
97.0%
97.0%
97.0%
96.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.6%
98.1%
98.6%
99.2%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.2%
41.0%
37.2%
41.0%
49.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.2%
11.1%
10.1%
12.0%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.9%
6.7%
3.9%
4.6%
16.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.6%
10.1%
6.4%
7.6%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.0%
10.5%
12.5%
8.6%
14.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.0%
7.6%
6.8%
3.8%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.6%
7.0%
8.6%
8.6%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7%
5.3%
4.5%
2.5%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.6%
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.2%
3.0%
3.0%
2.4%
3.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
2.7%
2.5%
2.4%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

77.8%
88.1%
95.2%
86.2%
81.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.0%
86.1%
86.1%
86.1%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.1%
79.3%
80.4%
76.5%
66.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
3.4%
3.7%
4.6%
3.6%
11.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9%
1.6%
1.2%
0.6%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
1.4%
1.0%
0.7%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016NY
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places