Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Pebble Creek

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Akron
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Recently I had my grandfather at Pebble Creek for rehab due to a fall at home. He had a total hip replacement, which increased his levels of dementia. I would have to say the staff was extremely helpful from the moment we arrived to the moment we left. They were very caring and compassionate to my grandfather. They were extremely friendly to my entire family visiting. The rehab he received was great and got him on the right track to home. The staff answered all of our questions, which we had a lot, and helped to plan his return to home. We had to get more help in the home and and they helped us through every step.

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    Just had a knee replacement and within a week, the therapist had me walking with no walker and no cane! The staff is caring, professional, and made my stay so much easier. The social workers put my mind at ease, the stna's were so helpful and the nurses were very kind and efficient. The only problem I encountered was that the food was wretched!! Thanks to the staff for taking good care of me!!

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    My grandmother was at pebble creek for 2 months. They told her at the hospital she would never walk again and would need to be in a home forever. 63 days later she walked out on a walker and is now back home with my mom just checking on her. The aides were wonderful and had so much patience. The nurses were true angels. Obviously the therapy was one of a kind considering they got her to walk again.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Pebble Creek is a really nice clean environment. Excellent therapy department. Staff really cares about everyone. Great job to all the staff.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My grandfather was here years ago. He had to be moved because they almost killed him with all of the medications he didn't need to be on. Staff just didn't want to deal with him so they drugged him as much as possible. He did a lot better after leaving here and lived many years at another facility that knew how to properly take care of the elderly. My other grandfather was here more recently right before he passed. The staff were not careful with moving him while he was in excruciating pain. Hated having to go back to this place.

About Pebble Creek

General Information

Legal Business NameJarvis Leasing Co LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 4, 1989 (29 years)
Capacity150
Residents131
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Pebble Creek

Pebble Creek
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 30, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

April 11, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Pebble Creek require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
34.5%
32.4%
51.3%
59.4%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.2%
20.0%
19.8%
16.9%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.7%
13.3%
16.8%
9.5%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.1%
11.8%
10.8%
7.4%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.8%
9.9%
12.5%
7.9%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
1.1%
2.3%
2.2%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
2.2%
3.4%
3.6%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2%
3.9%
4.0%
2.8%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
24.4%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.2%
1.1%
4.6%
0.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.1%
4.4%
3.4%
4.8%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.4%
99.4%
99.7%
98.7%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.7%
99.4%
99.4%
99.4%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.2%
57.2%
55.0%
63.8%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
1.4%
1.7%
1.5%
1.5%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.3%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places