Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Kingston Of Ashland

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Ashland
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    As a new employee with Kingston Healthcare Company, I must say that I've been totally impressed with the company, its mission and philosophy, and most of all...the entire Kingston Team! Not only are they genuinely dedicated and committed to providing the absolute best care possible, but they also deliver the care in such a manner that the caring message resonates within everything they do. Kingston Healthcare Company is definitely a 5 star company! I'm so blessed to be part of the Kingston of Ashland team.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I would have given five stars because the patient clients are cared for so well, inside is kept very clean, and professionalism is great. However, maintenance and upkeep seem to be lacking since my last visit from out-of-state last year. The court yard is in need of lawn service; weed eating, edging, and flower bed weeding. It is unsightly and looks unprofessional. The door handle to the court yard has been broken for at least the past six weeks (fire hazard in my opinion). Glass doors on the main entrance are dirty and grimy, look like they haven't been cleaned in about 3-4 months. That aside, I wouldn't put my family member anywhere else due to the quality of care.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    This is a high quality community. The staff is amazing!

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I have worked in several facilities during my career in healthcare. I am and have been pleasantly surprised by Kingston of Ashland. I am proud to recommend Kingston. I have seen teamwork though out the facility between STNAs , PT, OT , Nurses and administration. The client gets the best care when all the "team" communicates. I have seen folks that were so very ill and unable to walk into the facility walk out healthier and able to continue their life. I know if my family member needs excellent care and fantastic rehab I am going to do what ever it takes to get them to this facility.

  • ★★★★★ a week ago

    Clean and friendly.

About Kingston Of Ashland

General Information

Legal Business NameKingston Of Ashland, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 3, 1985 (33 years)
Capacity110
Residents101
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Kingston Of Ashland

Kingston Of Ashland
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 11, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Kingston Of Ashland require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 60min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
98.5%
98.6%
98.6%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.1%
63.2%
53.5%
51.3%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.2%
32.3%
27.3%
23.8%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.3%
33.9%
13.8%
20.1%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.4%
7.6%
7.2%
10.4%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.8%
23.0%
6.3%
9.5%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.1%
6.8%
8.8%
6.7%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.5%
4.5%
8.7%
9.0%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
7.4%
10.7%
7.5%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.9%
20.3%
20.0%
23.7%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5%
3.0%
7.2%
4.5%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
1.5%
1.4%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6%
3.6%
6.6%
3.1%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.3%
98.3%
98.7%
96.4%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.9%
89.5%
89.5%
89.5%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.4%
74.2%
74.2%
72.7%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.7%
25.1%
17.9%
14.5%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
1.7%
1.9%
0.4%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places