Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Canton Christian Home

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Canton
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Staff are attentive, caring, and most have been at Canton Christian Home for a number of years. We also like that the the home is operated with a Christian model and not solely on a business model.

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My time at CCH has been outstanding. I have recommended them to my friends and family and will continue to do so.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My mother is very happy at Canton Christian Home and she chose CCH for their skilled nursing services.

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    I chose Canton Christian Home because I felt at home. I am very comfortable and happy there.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    The facility is beautiful and clean. I feel comfortable knowing my dad is in good hands.

About Canton Christian Home

General Information

Legal Business NameCanton Christian Home Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 2004 (13 years)
Capacity75
Residents69
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Canton Christian Home

Canton Christian Home
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 21, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Canton Christian Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
94.9%
95.1%
96.8%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.1%
66.7%
64.7%
65.6%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.1%
26.4%
19.6%
20.3%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.8%
15.0%
19.2%
9.4%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.1%
10.2%
8.2%
7.9%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3%
8.0%
13.2%
7.1%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.5%
13.7%
5.2%
5.6%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.9%
8.5%
10.0%
5.1%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6%
8.3%
1.9%
5.8%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
1.6%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.5%
8.5%
3.3%
6.8%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
6.8%
9.8%
6.3%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
3.1%
5.3%
8.6%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

71.7%
64.9%
58.5%
57.4%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.2%
73.7%
73.7%
73.7%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.9%
80.9%
79.2%
78.1%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
22.7%
20.4%
17.4%
4.9%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
10.8%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.7%
4.3%
0.0%
2.8%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places