Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Marjorie P Lee Retirement Community

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Cincinnati
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Very well organized atmosphere. Everything is professional from the cooks to the nurses. The residents are the number one priority.

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Hi,I am an ex employee as of Nov,11,2016..I have had a wonderful experience with residents,staff,etc..I rated this 5 stars because it deserves it..on the other hand they don't value a great employee when in trouble or in need of help .. I was not only a housekeeper..I was the sunshine of the day on the fifth and sixth floor..I not only cleaned their apartments..I engaged a relationship with each resident.. I would go above and beyond..they not only look forward to the knock on their doors but they knew they had a warm welcome and an employee with a heart and lots of concerns ensuring their day was great even when I've exit.. I was terminated after having my first write up ruled as a final..no verbal ,no written,no 1,2 warning..just terminated when my second incident not caused by me occurred. Escorted out as if I was a criminal.. If anyone takes the time and go upstairs and ask just one resident about me..Even the cooperate office would know this had to be a mistake..As I sit back,I realize how I put my all in this job to be downgraded to being unemployed..Everything gone in a blink of an eye..I wish things could have been ruled differently..but as living conditions I would recommend anyone who needs to feel secure about their eldery and where they will reside to choose ers..but for a career /job be careful...this is not my name..But you will figure it out..because this action was wrong.. Thanks Ms.Adela and Mr.Emerson for a horrible/poor decisions.. Sad but true....since I had no say so maybe I'll be heard now...

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    The nursing staff were rude.

  • ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Went on a tour of this place with my mother, to check it out for my stepfather. Explained what his issues were, how old he was, & his possible length of stay. During our tour the valet guy came to let me know he had hit a van with my car & it broke my headlight, but that was all. So after our tour I go out & look at the damage. The maintenance supervisor had called while I was there & talked to the valet & I was told that they would pay for the damages. Then when the time came to fix it, they just wanted to fix the light, not the damaged bumper, hood, or side panel. Got an estimate for $1200 & was told a week after we gave them the estimate & had to call them to see what the hold up was that they have to get approval first to see if they can pay for it. Then on top of that, when the time came to put my stepfater in the facility they said that they could not take him cause he was not old enough & had to be 60 before he could be a resident there. No mention of an age limitation when we told them during the tour aboug his age & his medical issues. Yes, the place looked great, smelled great, and the residents looked well care for, but if this is how they do business, then forget it.

  • ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Terry and I chose MPL because it looked like the right place for us, literally--you can't beat the built-in healthy walking distance from Hyde Park Square, the post office, 2 banks, the public library, and several churches. We really had no idea until we actually lived here what an authentically warm, caring community MPL is. Moving in from out of state, we were prepared to be the "new kids" for a while, until people sized us up; instead we were made to feel welcome by staff and residents alike. The first few times we went to the dining room I felt quite nervous, but the atmosphere was so friendly--and the food so surprisingly good--that we were comfortable very soon. Beyond the generally high quality of the food is the wide variety offered at every meal--and usually you can have any "extra" on request--for example, Terry often asks for, and receives, bacon & tomato in his grilled cheese sandwich. The other great and wonderful surprise was the helpful attitude of everyone on the staff, including the maintenance crew, who seem to be able to fix anything, and do it with amazing good cheer. MPL drivers take bus loads to events and outings all over the Cincinnati area and can drive single residents to appointments on request; and the housekeeping department keeps the whole place--including our apartment-- sparkling. Coming here seems, after a year and a half, to be one of the very best decisions we ever made.

About Marjorie P Lee Retirement Community

General Information

Legal Business NameEpiscopal Retirement Homes, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 28, 1990 (27 years)
Capacity60
Residents46
Percent Occupied77%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Marjorie P Lee Retirement Community

Marjorie P Lee Retirement Community
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 3, 2016 - 1 year ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

March 19, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Marjorie P Lee Retirement Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 15min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 50min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.2%
10.7%
3.6%
7.4%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
53.5%
-
25.3%
16.9%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.1%
24.1%
19.4%
14.3%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.6%
18.5%
7.1%
14.8%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
18.5%
16.7%
5.7%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
4.0%
3.1%
0.0%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
23.3%
7.1%
11.4%
18.2%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.5%
3.7%
0.0%
5.7%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%
3.4%
2.8%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
4.2%
3.1%
3.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.2%
99.4%
98.7%
99.4%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.8%
53.1%
56.4%
53.7%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.2%
8.0%
15.5%
16.0%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
2.3%
1.7%
0.9%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places