Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Margaret Hall Inc

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Cincinnati
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Having recently been in St. Margaret Hall's Rehab unit following total knee replacement, I feel so fortunate to have been there and received the excellent, respectful and kind care the staff provided. Everyone I encountered--nurses, aides, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, dietitians, office staff-- did their utmost to provide a healing experience.The Rehab unit, which I understand was recently renovated, was set up perfectly to provide the physical supports I needed. The rooms were pleasant and clean and well-kept. I would heartily recommend St. Margaret Hall Rehab to anyone recovering from knee, or similar, surgeries.

  • ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    I had encouraged my mom to consider moving to a nursing home for some time because it was becoming harder and harder for her to live on her own, caring for the house etc. I was also concerned about her safety. Well, last July (2012) she fell and broke her leg. The operation was difficult but she made it through and eventually landed at St. Margaret Hall. Needless to say she was not happy about the move, and the initial transition was somewhat difficult. But the positive input from the entire staff at St. Margaret's has been so amazing that my mom has really adapted well as a result. She regularly sings the praises of the caregivers whom she interacts with on a daily basis and every time I visit she will single out a staff member or two who has gone out of their way to be nice or do something special. There are a lot of emotions and challenges that go along with transitioning from your own home to a nursing home but I couldn't think of a better place to help with the transition than St. Margaret Hall. Thank you, and keep up the great work!

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Aides work very hard, but is under paid. Not the greatest environment for employees, so I don't think I would recommend family members staying here.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    EXcellent.

  • ★★★★★ 7 years ago

    Our mother had a massive stroke 10 years ago, when she lived in Florida. She was in homes there for almost 7 years, both of which were terrible places. When the family was transferred to Cincinnati 3 years ago, my sister and I looked at homes. We were recommended to St Margaret's by the real estate agent, whose own mother had lived for 12 years at St Margaret's. Once we had seen St. Margaret's, the others looked less than ok to us. Although we had to wait about a month to get her in, we have been so happy we didn't settle for another facility. Our mother has a great quality of life there, while receiving the care she cannot live without. There are constant activities, and residents are encouraged to participate. It's a clean and efficient home, filled with people who really care about their residents. I know that if I ever have to be in a nursing home, I would try to be in a Carmelite facility. These people know how to treat the elderly - with respect and kindness, allowing them to retain their dignity. Thank you, St Margaret's!

About St Margaret Hall Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameSt. Margaret Hall
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 17, 1989 (28 years)
Capacity99
Residents92
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Margaret Hall Inc

St Margaret Hall Inc
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 18, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Margaret Hall Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.8%
98.8%
98.8%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
57.5%
54.1%
64.9%
56.2%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.8%
19.7%
18.7%
20.5%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
7.5%
5.8%
6.1%
14.8%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.4%
10.4%
12.7%
14.5%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.9%
8.8%
12.3%
11.1%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2%
1.1%
3.3%
4.4%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.6%
5.2%
3.8%
7.8%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.2%
10.7%
9.8%
8.1%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
13.2%
7.8%
5.0%
5.1%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.0%
3.9%
3.8%
10.4%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.7%
7.7%
7.4%
3.8%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
0.9%
1.0%
4.3%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.8%
98.5%
100.0%
96.2%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.5%
98.4%
98.4%
98.4%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.9%
59.5%
67.2%
60.3%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.9%
11.9%
15.2%
6.5%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.9%
0.0%
2.0%
1.8%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places