Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Willow Park Convalescent Home

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Cleveland
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Shavon Finesse
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I was trying to get in here to work as a STNA. After visiting a family friend I was delighted to be passed over for employment. It strongly smells like old urine on the second floor and in the elevator. Their 2nd floor "quiet room" is closed off and depressing. I'm guessing it was the family room until the TV was taken out. The nurse's are mean and the receptionists are all rude with nasty attitudes. I didn't see one STNA providing any type of care. DO NOT SEND YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS HERE.

  • Shawna Fitzpatrick
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    DO NOT put your loved one here!!! This place is a dump. I went to visit one of my family members that had been placed here and I was shocked and disgusted, As soon as I got off the elevator, one of the workers was yelling at a resident. The furniture in the rooms on the 2nd floor is old and the mattresses are old and thin. The curtains in the rooms were falling off and the sheets had holes in them. The staff treat the patients with dementia HORRIBLY!!! They need to shut this place down. There is a distinct difference between the 1st floor and 2nd floor. I feel sorry for the residents who are forced to live there. They are not treated with dignity or respect. This place reminds me of a animal shelter for HUMANS!!! The residents are treated like prisoners. The residents look miserable there. They shove trays in front of them during dining like pets. Also, the sanitation of this place is questionable. DEPRESSING AND HORRIBLE PLACE!!! DO SOME COMPARISONS! LOOK AT WILLOW PARK AND THEN LOOK AT MENORAH!!!

  • C T
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Depressing place and atmosphere, in a depressing and dangerous neighborhood.

  • Jerome Marion
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    It's a helpful facility in our community

  • Tammy Boyd
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Clean

About Willow Park Convalescent Home

General Information

Legal Business NameEmbassy Willow Park LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 7, 1991 (27 years)
Capacity135
Residents119
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Willow Park Convalescent Home

Willow Park Convalescent Home
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 14, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide residents with private access to a telephone.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision and hearing.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Willow Park Convalescent Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 15min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.8%
95.6%
95.6%
95.6%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
99.1%
93.0%
90.7%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.5%
44.2%
50.0%
46.2%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.2%
12.9%
11.8%
11.0%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.2%
30.4%
26.0%
14.0%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
27.2%
24.4%
22.1%
24.4%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.8%
27.5%
25.0%
15.5%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.6%
3.3%
1.0%
1.9%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.2%
5.6%
6.1%
7.4%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.6%
1.8%
3.4%
5.9%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
3.9%
1.0%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

77.4%
63.4%
52.7%
43.8%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.7%
50.7%
50.7%
50.7%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.8%
83.3%
-
-
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
23.3%
9.5%
0.0%
15.2%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places