Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Capital City Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Ce

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Ohio
  3. Columbus Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Karen G
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Thank you so much for your care. You have all been so helpful and caring during my stay. You have an excellent group of caregivers and aides. Your cleaning staff, maintenance, and kitchen workers were all very supportive and efficient. The nurses are on top of things and know my needs even before i asked. Everyone was extremely friendly and supportive. Thanks for your care and patience!

  • Contonna Hamilton
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I got hire at this facility I work one shift and it was horrible the resident rooms were dirty and disgusting the workers were rude and unprofessional also the Human Resources was very unprofessional the care for residents was badly lights were going off and stna were not where to be found I felt the stna were just their for a pay check not for the resident I went two room to give care one resident had bm dried on her from the night shift her bed was soil all the way to the mattress she had soiled bandages all over her it looks like she hadn't had any care for many shifts. The other resident room I went in to help had soiled dried sheets the he said been on his bed all week and he also stated that he had his clothes on since Thursday. Then I went to get towels and Linen so I could give care to the resident and none was available so I went the laundry and wasn't even able to get linen then was told to wash the residents with wipe. I also went to pass ice at the end of my shift and most of the resident drinking mugs were filthy and disgusting I had clean all the mugs out before giving ice. Then the Human Resources lady had the nerve to just call me and tell some people that were on a tour said they bump me and I gave a rude response to them bumping me which I don't recall and told me i was fired they should of beeen happy for the bump but I guess someone had to justify the lack of know how to give a tour he didn't even know were the Dialysis rooms were and asked me I was like this is my first day I do not have a clue where anything it was .All I have to say never take your love ones there if you truly love them. This place is a deaf trap waiting to kill someone love one. I should report them to the state.

  • valerie c
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My grandmother was admitted to this nursing home 2 years ago. Ever since then, she has been taken great care of. Only improvement that should be made is faster service. I understand there are other residents being taken care of, but it'd be nice if the attention is given 24/7

  • Luci T
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Spent 2 wks her after knee surgery. The facility needs to be remodeled. Very old and alot of things were outdated. Staff was lazy. Nurse would not answer my call light and had to wait 45 min in pain for my medication. Would not recommend this place.

  • Roger Atkinson
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    DO NOT use this facility my son was here for 3 days and they never gave him a bath he sat in soiled sheets was for rehab speech therapist was the only one that cared. Rest of staff hid call lights staying 2-3 hrs at a time food looked regurgitated from garbage disposal and again i do not recommend this place to anyone needs to closed down

About Capital City Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Ce

General Information

Legal Business NameGarden Rehab And Health Care At Victorian Village LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 10, 1975 (45 years)
Capacity104
Residents62
Percent Occupied60%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Capital City Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Ce

Capital City Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Ce was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 3, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.

April 19, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintLet residents choose a personal doctor.

February 5, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 17 days
---Fine$2,340 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Capital City Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Ce require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 30min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 30min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.1%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
94.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.7%
96.4%
98.0%
98.0%
95.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
34.4%
39.4%
42.9%
50.0%
42.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.9%
7.3%
2.1%
4.9%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.0%
30.2%
20.7%
28.9%
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.6%
15.6%
17.1%
11.9%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.6%
37.0%
31.9%
34.2%
15.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.1%
7.1%
4.1%
8.2%
7.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.1%
11.1%
3.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
8.5%
6.4%
17.0%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2%
2.4%
2.5%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

81.9%
69.4%
88.2%
94.5%
86.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.0%
72.1%
72.1%
72.1%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.0%
86.9%
-
-
66.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
31.1%
10.3%
0.0%
2.2%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
3.6%
-
3.3%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places