Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Mayfair Village Nursing Care C

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Columbus
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Thank you for the wonderful experience with my loved one. My Grandma absolutely loved the staff, they were attentive to her needs and explained the whole experience from start to finish up front, there were no surprise's. The food was very good. I have know doubt she would return if she needed to in the future. She was concerned about going to this type of facility but she is so thankful she chose yours. Thank you so much for the personal care you provided to her. I would not hesitate to recommend you in the future, thank again.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    This is a wonderful facility! Professionally run, very clean, fantastic rehabilitation staff, great food, and very caring. My mom thrived there and built strength amazingly fast. The rehab staff has ways to encourage patients and keep them progressing, and are a delight. Her stay there was a huge success. Her room was mopped, trash emptied and sink and bathroom cleaned multiple times a day. They have activities for those who are interested and able, including happy hour on Fridays with live music. I highly recommend them without hesitation. The longevity of the staff speaks volumes about any business management, and if you ask them, you will be surprised at how long many have been there.

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My 82 year old mother is staying at Mayfair, and was moved there from another facility that was sub-par, to say the least. Mayfair is one of the best facilities in Central Ohio. Our family reviewed many locations, and put my mother in another facility because of their "lock down" unit they have. We assumed this would be a safer environment, only have her left unattended and ultimately fall and fracture her hip! I can not say enough about the facility and personnel that work at Mayfair. Starting with the business office, activities instructors and the physical therapy workers, as well as the nurses, all are exceptional! You know that there is a real care and concern for your loved one. After placing my mother there she has become more responsive and engaging, I can only attribute this to the staff, and their going "above and beyond" care and attitude toward there patients / clients. Again I can not say enough that we are much happier that our mother is getting the care / attention she needed to not only continue but to thrive, were as before she seemed to be in a state of decline, while at the previous facility. I am not sure what happened with other low reviews that I see here, but can assure you, placing your loved one at Mayfair is a decision you will not regret. I have also heard glowing reviews from many other people who have had loved ones at Mayfair, and never have I personally heard a negative comment from anyone.

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Very irresponsible. Medication was left in my mom's room that turned out to be for another patient, fortunately my mom was too weak to get up and take it. Ruthie a charge nurse and Shannon said it happened because they were trying to hurry and get iv fluid hooked up because my mom was dehydrated. Dr. Hollister was supposed to have ordered labs, for 2 days I asked different nurses about that, none were ever ordered so none were drawn. That was aggravating. The next morning I went in and there on my mom's cart where food trays are put, layed approximately 6 sheets of multiple patient's medical information, such as lab orders and lab results, medical information concerning their health, with their personal information, age, gender, name, the rooms numbers at facility, doctors names. That was dated January 16th to the 19th. I'm pretty sure that is a Hippa violation. My mom arrived on a Wednesday evening then by Saturday morning had to be taken to same hospital she had came from because of developing a uti. The staff is very unprofessional, irresponsible and negligent with paperwork and medication. The staff also displays unprofessional looking personal appearances. The floor was never mopped for the almost 5 days my mom stayed there. Overall the facility wasn't neat or tidy. The nurses are incompetent and inexperienced and aren't capable giving the correct care for patients who require medication and medical needs as my mom did. My mom required wound care from surgery and ileostomy care. The medical personal was unable to care properly for wound with wound vac. So if you have a loved one that requires wound vac care, this facility isn't skilled enough for that level of medical needs. I shared all my concerns and frustrations with the director Shante. It was clear that she herself was embarrassed as she should and appalled. I was outraged with the entire facility and anyone affiliated with the Mayfair Village name should be embarrassed. I truly hope my experience that I'm sharing publicly helps others.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I've had several loved ones here and it was great. I truly recommend it to anyone. The nurses are great food is really good the entire staff is wonderful. Love it. Very clean

About Mayfair Village Nursing Care C

General Information

Legal Business NameConsolidated Resources Health Care
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 12, 1979 (39 years)
Capacity100
Residents84
Percent Occupied84%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Mayfair Village Nursing Care C

Mayfair Village Nursing Care C
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 24, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Mayfair Village Nursing Care C require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
88.2%
88.2%
88.2%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
59.5%
68.8%
66.7%
68.4%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.3%
22.2%
19.0%
27.4%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.5%
18.4%
20.9%
25.1%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.9%
13.6%
15.4%
17.2%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.3%
17.2%
17.5%
20.3%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.1%
10.0%
11.4%
11.9%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.0%
5.7%
2.9%
4.5%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
1.8%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
4.4%
7.8%
13.8%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.4%
1.4%
8.7%
7.6%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
2.9%
1.4%
2.9%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.5%
95.6%
98.3%
98.2%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
88.5%
88.5%
88.5%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.5%
68.8%
60.8%
63.3%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.1%
21.3%
21.8%
14.7%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.8%
1.6%
0.7%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places