Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Grafton Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Ohio
  3. Dayton Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • AboutSTNA 2020
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I am pretty sure these 5 stars are not by honest rating, rather dishonest employees. I applied few days ago despite all of the warnings and somehow i got denied today ?. Apparently, they only hire aids with missing teeth, Jordans and gold chains, or maybe aids who pull guns on each other in their parking lot. Not aids with morals and ethics. I never cared to read the reviews here, but boy they couldn't be more accurate. HR is very unprofessional. Staff is disgusting. The facility is disorganized and the interview process is disgusting. Smh. That's all I can say. It is one thing to be short on the floor, but it is a whole other thing for the facility staff to be unprofessional from the beginning. These people don't want to do no work. Period.

  • Nicole Wells
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    By all means if you are searching for a place to send your loved one or a place to work, this is NOT the place!!! This place has no moral value to them at all. The facility is not clean and most of all the residents are not properly cared for. There is a energy of negativity over this place, the residents seem very unhappy and depressed on top of the negelance that is clearly visible due to the horrible appearance of the residents. If you have any humanity , then please take this review into heave and bypass Grafton Oaks on all aspects!!!

  • Amber White
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    There is always room for improvement for every business you run; however Grafton Oaks is a great place for your love one to stay. They will be happy and loved.

  • Joey cassidy
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The staff is rude, it is a very disturbing place to visit, it seems like the place for people that have been forgotten by society. From the moment I walked into Grafton Oaks I felt depressed and just had a very negative vibe, this place is a great example of why you should always visit a nursing facility before sending a loved there. NEVER TRUST REVIEWS!

  • Tonya Cheffer
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    As Grafton Oaks Director of Activities I must share with the Community what an Amazing Experience it has been this past year. The Professional Administrative Team has such deep Caring & Love for our Residents & their Families and The Grafton Oaks Employees and their Families as well. Grafton is far and above the Best Nursing Facility I've had the pleasure to call my Work Home. I am very Proud and Happy to be a part of the last Privately Owned Nursing Centers in the Gem City Area. Please, Feel free to come and take a look for yourself soon ?

About Grafton Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameGrafton Associates Limited Partnership Ptr
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 21, 1988 (31 years)
Capacity99
Residents90
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Grafton Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Grafton Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 24, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

September 11, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintUse a registered nurse at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week.

August 8, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

June 22, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Grafton Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 35min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 35min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
96.8%
96.8%
96.8%
94.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
25.6%
23.9%
18.9%
23.1%
42.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.7%
29.5%
29.9%
32.0%
24.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.8%
34.9%
25.0%
28.3%
18.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
35.9%
29.0%
26.3%
37.3%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.0%
25.3%
23.9%
28.6%
15.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.8%
6.7%
7.3%
8.8%
7.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7%
2.4%
0.9%
1.8%
5.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3%
4.3%
0.0%
2.2%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.2%
0.0%
4.3%
7.0%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.2%
1.2%
1.2%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
1.1%
1.2%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
0.0%
1.2%
3.8%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

79.4%
97.2%
100.0%
98.1%
86.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
19.0%
0.0%
3.3%
3.3%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
0.0%
8.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places