Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Heartland Of Eaton

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Eaton
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Denise Emmons
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I am proud to say that I am a Unit Manager at Maple Gardens ( used to be Heartland of Eaton) After working in long term care for 20 years, it is nice to see that there is still staff that cares for the residents. This is hard to find now a days as many of you know. We the staff are very welcoming and caring for residents. We all take pride in our work in making sure the best quality of care is delivered to each of the residents as if they were our own family members. After all, we are our own family within the facility too. If my mother was still alive I would not hesitate in having the staff here for her care. Please feel free to tour or call with any questions. We would love to hear from and be proud to make your loved one our loved one!!

  • Jane Marshall
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    I had a family member stay here.. the staff acted like they were high or drunk the half the time. The food was abustley terrible, looked like dog food, tasted like trash. Everytime I called the facility to ask how my mom was doing or to talk to my mother I either never got anyone to pick up or was on hold for 30 minutes. The worst part about whole experience was that I found out they had a bed bug infestion on the same unit my mother was staying in. Don't put your loved one here. You'll regret it!

  • Alexa Joyce
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Family member testimonial: ""When our mother, Louise, broke her hip we were overwhelmed with the decisions that needed to be made for her. We didn't know anything about nursing facilities or of what was to come. We chose Maple Gardens because they are a 5-star facility. We had been to another 5-star facility before, but it wasn't anything like this place; it felt cold and the staff just seemed to be doing their job. The staff at Maple Gardens weren't like that, they made us feel like we are family. The atmosphere is warm and home like, the food is great, the therapy was excellent and the hands-on care was fantastic. We couldn't have asked for a better place and would recommend Maple Gardens to anyone that was in need." -Susan & Linda, daughters of Louise"

  • Laura Rohde
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Heartland of Eaton is now call Maple Gardens. It is the same staff; same great customer service; same building just a different name. Our staff is committed to every resident to make sure they have what they need and are comfortable. We are a small town atmosphere with big hearts to take care of those who need us the most.

  • D Barry
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Pretty decent facility. Had a relative there and a close family friend. The activity staff is great. The ones that work with the residents on a daily basis really care for them.

About Heartland Of Eaton

General Information

Legal Business NameHeartland Of Eaton Oh LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 12, 1981 (36 years)
Capacity100
Residents77
Percent Occupied77%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Heartland Of Eaton

Heartland Of Eaton
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 12, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

October 20, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$3,200 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Heartland Of Eaton require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 35min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 5min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.3%
95.4%
97.0%
96.7%
95.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
39.3%
37.0%
30.8%
30.4%
42.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.3%
30.9%
32.7%
31.2%
24.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.6%
9.1%
10.6%
12.9%
18.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.0%
11.5%
8.1%
5.4%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.9%
10.2%
0.0%
2.6%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.8%
4.7%
1.3%
0.0%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
6.3%
4.6%
1.6%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4%
2.6%
5.0%
2.6%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%
3.1%
4.5%
3.3%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
5.4%
3.3%
2.9%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

62.3%
81.6%
84.4%
77.6%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
49.4%
69.7%
69.7%
69.7%
82.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.7%
54.0%
66.2%
69.7%
62.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
37.5%
28.0%
38.9%
47.1%
17.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
1.7%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016OH
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places